Website review, no card needed
intermiamicf.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202656 issues · 97 checks
This review found 56 issues worth fixing on intermiamicf.com, 26 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 176 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 181 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.3 s
3.5 s
4.7 s
5.8 s
7.0 s
8.2 s
9.4 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
26.8 s · 7.3 MBAbout 7.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 26.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
26.1 s · 7.8 MB244 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.8 MB).
Improve image delivery
6.0 s · 2.8 MB25 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.0 s faster on a phone.
tiktokcdn-us.com adds 1.0 s
1.0 stiktokcdn-us.com costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 74.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
5.3 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.3 s.
Minify JavaScript
3.2 s · 609 KiB609 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
2.6 s · 416 KiB416 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.9 s · 359 KiBAbout 359 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 18.8 s
A phone's processor spends 18.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 10.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s
1.2 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,635 HTML elements
The page has 3,635 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, tiktokcdn-us.com and gofevo.com and others), adding 85.1 MB and 4.4 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.3 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
gofevo.com adds 662 ms
662 msgofevo.com costs a phone 662 ms of main-thread work and 5.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 419 ms
419 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 419 ms of main-thread work and 609 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Maps adds 291 ms
291 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 291 ms of main-thread work and 786 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
40 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 48 ms
48 msYour server sent the HTML in 48 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.44
0.44For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.44 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sThe first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 75.6 s
75.6 sYour largest element takes 75.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We and our partners use cookies, pixels, and similar tracki…”.
Speed Index: 45.1 s
45.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 45.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 4.9 s
4.9 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 4.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 147.9 s
147.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 147.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 233 ms
233 msReal visitors wait 233 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 181 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 96.0 MB in 724 requests
96.0 MBYour homepage downloads 96.0 MB in 724 requests on a phone: media 66.1 MB (14), scripts 15.0 MB (249) and images 11.0 MB (147). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images in older formats
9 images (827 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
5 images far larger than shown
465 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example IMCF_Logos-01_qxhjrp.png at 3,300 px wide, shown at 38 px. Resized copies would save about 465 KiB.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (378 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 27.2 g of CO₂ per visit
27.21 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 27.21 g of CO₂e: 3265.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (12 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
3 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element (41 elements).
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (29 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Inter Miami CF”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
116 internal links, 70 external
The homepage links to 116 pages on intermiamicf.com and 70 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 115 characters
Your meta description is 115 characters: “Official Website of Inter Miami CF. Bringing world-class fútbol to Miami, currently playing in Major League Soccer.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.intermiamicf.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.intermiamicf.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.intermiamicf.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (823 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
9 pages share a title
/, https://www.intermiamicf.com/nu-stadium/index, https://www.intermiamicf.com/community/foundation, https://www.intermiamicf.com/team-store, https://www.intermiamicf.com/news/index and https://www.intermiamicf.com/video/latest/index and 3 others all use the title “Inter Miami CF”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages share a meta description
https://www.intermiamicf.com/nu-stadium/index, https://www.intermiamicf.com/community/foundation, https://www.intermiamicf.com/team-store, https://www.intermiamicf.com/news/index, https://www.intermiamicf.com/video/latest/index and https://www.intermiamicf.com/community/index and 2 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 10 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.intermiamicf.com/nu-stadium/index, whose canonical is https://www.intermiamicf.com/nu-stadium. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.intermiamicf.com/team-store and https://www.intermiamicf.com/events/index have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.intermiamicf.com/tickets/member-central/index, https://www.intermiamicf.com/news/index and https://www.intermiamicf.com/video/latest/index took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “ErrorUtils caught an error: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'id') Subsequent non-fatal errors won't be log…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
16 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 779 words of copy
The homepage carries about 779 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy Tickets!”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Schedule”, “Shop” and “Buy Tickets”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 3 testimonial or review blocks, 6 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amplitude, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
67 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 67 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at intermiamicf.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Akamai
Company
- Founded
- 2018
- Headquarters
- Miami
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 56 issues on intermiamicf.com, including 30 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.