Website review, no card needed
intis.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202621 issues · 72 checks
This review found 21 issues worth fixing on intis.eu, 4 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
89BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 85
85/100Your mobile performance score is 85. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
670 ms · 190 KiBAbout 190 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 670 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
160 KiBAbout 160 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot and Google Fonts), adding 43 KiB and 133 ms of main-thread time.
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 98 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
52 KiB3 images could be 52 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
33 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (33 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 324 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 102 ms
102 msYour server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 7.8 s
7.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.6 s
5.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sYour largest element takes 2.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Intelligent, Connected Technology”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.055
0.055The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.055, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 24 ms
24 msScripts block the page for only 24 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image in older formats
1 image (30 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.35 g of CO₂e: 41.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 1.2 MB in 41 requests
1.2 MBYour homepage downloads 1.2 MB in 41 requests on a phone: scripts 545 KiB (17), fonts 347 KiB (12) and stylesheets 210 KiB (4). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 45 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (26 characters)
Your title is only 26 characters: “Intis - Global IoT Company”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“IntelligentConnected Technology”, “” and “Intelligent, Connected Technology”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
27 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 27 pages on intis.eu and 31 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 121 characters
Your meta description is 121 characters: “Intis is a global IoT product company, specializing in developing connected intelligent SaaS, IoT, and AI-based product…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://intis.eu/en/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://intis.eu/en/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://intis.eu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,094 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share 3 titles
https://intis.eu/en and / all use the title “Intis - Global IoT Company”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages share a meta description
https://intis.eu/en/about-us and https://intis.eu/about-us use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://intis.eu/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
7 pages without an H1
https://intis.eu/en/about-us, https://intis.eu/en/careers, https://intis.eu/en/contact, https://intis.eu/building-automation, https://intis.eu/about-us and https://intis.eu/contact and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://intis.eu/hr, https://intis.eu/building-automation, https://intis.eu/about-us and https://intis.eu/contact took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
9 internal pages checked
We fetched 9 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 9 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 9 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 9 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Connecting to 'https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Open+Sans:400,700' violates the following Content Security Polic…”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 778 words of copy
The homepage carries about 778 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Contact us”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at intis.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- DigitalOcean
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 21 issues on intis.eu, including 7 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.