Website review, no card needed
intoday.in website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202638 issues · 83 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on intoday.in, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 281 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 269 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 276 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 287 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 279 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 271 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 307 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
22.5 s · 3.7 MBAbout 3.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 22.5 s faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 3.5 s
3.5 sYouTube costs a phone 3.5 s of main-thread work and 6.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 8.5 s
A phone's processor spends 8.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 7.5 MB and 3.8 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
900 ms · 511 KiB12 images could be 511 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 464 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 321 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
106 KiBAbout 106 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Render-blocking requests
50 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 50 ms.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
17 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (17 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 16 ms
16 msYour server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s
8.4 sThe first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 39.2 s
39.2 sYour largest element takes 39.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 16.5 s
16.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 50.3 s
50.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 50.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 851 ms
851 msReal visitors wait 851 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
103 images without width and height
103 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 281 ms to 307 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 143 ms
143 msReal visitors wait 143 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.058
0.058The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.058, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.0 MB in 213 requests
10.0 MBYour homepage downloads 10.0 MB in 213 requests on a phone: scripts 6.2 MB (39), images 2.4 MB (103) and HTML 558 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
18 images in older formats
18 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
21 images below the first screen load straight away
21 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
2 images far larger than shown
126 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example cover-image.png at 1,440 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 126 KiB.
About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit
2.83 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.83 g of CO₂e: 339.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
104 images without alt text
104 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
155 links without text
155 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (58 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 58 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at indiatodaygroup.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
11 internal links, 244 external
The homepage links to 11 pages on intoday.in and 244 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 132 characters
Your meta description is 132 characters: “INDIA TODAY GROUP: India Today, Business Today, Aaj Tak, Care Today, Mail Today, Cosmopolitan, Reader's Digest, India T…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “India Today Group”.
Title: 40 characters
Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “India's No.1 English Hindi news magazine”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,431 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/about-us.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/contact.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/advertise.html, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/privacy-policy.html and https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/t&c.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/about-us.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/contact.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/advertise.html, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/privacy-policy.html and https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/t&c.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
5 internal pages checked
We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 5 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,090 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,090 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Subscribe” and “Call Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
13 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at intoday.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Founded
- 2003
- Headquarters
- Noida
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on intoday.in, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.