Website review, no card needed

intoday.in logo

intoday.in website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202638 issues · 83 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on intoday.in, 15 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.7 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
313 ms263 msMay 9Oct 24307 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026281 ms
May 16, 2026269 ms
May 23, 2026276 ms
May 30, 2026284 ms
Jun 6, 2026283 ms
Jun 13, 2026287 ms
Jun 20, 2026287 ms
Jun 27, 2026290 ms
Jul 4, 2026292 ms
Jul 11, 2026290 ms
Jul 18, 2026292 ms
Jul 25, 2026290 ms
Aug 1, 2026282 ms
Aug 8, 2026279 ms
Aug 15, 2026276 ms
Aug 22, 2026279 ms
Aug 29, 2026279 ms
Sep 5, 2026282 ms
Sep 12, 2026286 ms
Sep 19, 2026280 ms
Sep 26, 2026280 ms
Oct 3, 2026278 ms
Oct 10, 2026271 ms
Oct 17, 2026285 ms
Oct 24, 2026307 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of intoday.in (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. intoday.in at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. intoday.in at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. intoday.in at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. intoday.in at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. intoday.in at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. intoday.in at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. intoday.in at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. intoday.in at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix31
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    22.5 s · 3.7 MB

    About 3.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 22.5 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    YouTube costs a phone 3.5 s of main-thread work and 6.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 31

    31/100

    Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 7.5 MB and 3.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    900 ms · 511 KiB

    12 images could be 511 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 464 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Google Fonts adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Google Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 321 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    106 KiB

    About 106 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Render-blocking requests

    50 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 50 ms.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    17 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (17 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 16 ms

    16 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 8.4 s

    8.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 8.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 39.2 s

    39.2 s

    Your largest element takes 39.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 16.5 s

    16.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 16.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 50.3 s

    50.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 50.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 851 ms

    851 ms

    Real visitors wait 851 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 103 images without width and height

    103 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 281 ms to 307 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 143 ms

    143 ms

    Real visitors wait 143 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.058

    0.058

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.058, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 10.0 MB in 213 requests

    10.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.0 MB in 213 requests on a phone: scripts 6.2 MB (39), images 2.4 MB (103) and HTML 558 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 18 images in older formats

    18 images (1.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 21 images below the first screen load straight away

    21 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    126 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example cover-image.png at 1,440 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 126 KiB.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.83 g of CO₂e: 339.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8090
  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 104 images without alt text

    104 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 155 links without text

    155 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (58 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 58 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9288
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at indiatodaygroup.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 11 internal links, 244 external

    The homepage links to 11 pages on intoday.in and 244 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “INDIA TODAY GROUP: India Today, Business Today, Aaj Tak, Care Today, Mail Today, Cosmopolitan, Reader's Digest, India T…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “India Today Group”.

  • Title: 40 characters

    Your title is a healthy 40 characters: “India's No.1 English Hindi news magazine”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,431 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/about-us.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/contact.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/advertise.html, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/privacy-policy.html and https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/t&c.html have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/about-us.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/contact.php, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/advertise.html, https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/privacy-policy.html and https://www.indiatodaygroup.com/t&c.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 internal pages checked

    We fetched 5 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 5 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,090 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,090 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 12 calls to action

    The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Contact us”, “Subscribe” and “Call Us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at intoday.in, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
2003
Headquarters
Noida

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on intoday.in, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25