Website review, no card needed
ip.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202637 issues · 102 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on ip.com, 13 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 16.4 MB in 118 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 5.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 140 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 222 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
ip.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
3,051 HTML elements
The page has 3,051 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 82
82/100Your mobile performance score is 82. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
577 KiB18 images could be 577 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Google Tag Manager adds 247 ms
247 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
140 ms · 247 KiBAbout 247 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
290 ms · 51 KiBAbout 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 290 ms faster on a phone.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Google Analytics and others), adding 347 KiB and 248 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 140 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 403 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 56 ms
56 msYour server sent the HTML in 56 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.2 s
5.2 sReal visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.9 s
5.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 233 ms
233 msReal visitors wait 233 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 52% slower for real visitors
+52%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.205
0.205The layout shifts by 0.205 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 6.2 s
6.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 5.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sYour largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “IP.com delivers the corpus-grounded, scored, citable intell…”.
Total Blocking Time: 110 ms
110 msScripts block the page for only 110 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 16.4 MB in 118 requests
16.4 MBYour homepage downloads 16.4 MB in 118 requests on a phone: media 9.4 MB (1), images 5.9 MB (65) and scripts 605 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
38 images in older formats
38 images (5.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Defensive-Publishing-Book-Cover-2048x2023-1-768x759.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (858 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit
4.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.65 g of CO₂e: 558.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
30 text elements with low contrast
30 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 69 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (67 characters)
Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “AI-Powered IP Intelligence Across the Innovation Lifecycle | IP.com”.
Meta description is long (234 characters)
Your meta description is 234 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
19 links with vague text
19 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
158 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 158 pages on ip.com and 11 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The AI Behind Every Defensible IP Decision.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ip.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ip.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,678 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bsky.app/profile/ipdotcom.bsky.social (404).
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (ip.com).
Valid certificate (97 days left)
The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust EV RSA CA G2 verifies for ip.com and is valid for another 97 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://ip.com redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
DNSSEC is off
ip.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
3 checks passed
Domain is 28 years old
28 yearsip.com was registered in Jul 1998 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Certificate issuers are restricted
CAA records allow only digicert.com, letsencrypt.org, geotrust.com and comodoca.com to issue certificates for ip.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.
Registered until Jun 2030
ip.com is registered until Jun 2030.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,151 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,151 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
25 calls to action
The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Download”, “Contact Us” and “Book a Demo”.
21 short forms
21 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 85/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 include:_spf.fortimailcloud.com include:aspmx.pardot.co…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “s1”, “s2” and “dkim”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Employees
- 61
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on ip.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.