Website review, no card needed

ip.com logo

ip.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202637 issues · 102 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on ip.com, 13 of them high impact, across 102 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 16.4 MB in 118 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.4 s4.3 sMay 16Oct 315.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20265.1 s
May 23, 20265.1 s
May 30, 20265.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.3 s
Jun 13, 20265.3 s
Jun 20, 20265.3 s
Jun 27, 20265.2 s
Jul 4, 20265.0 s
Aug 1, 20265.1 s
Aug 15, 20264.4 s
Aug 22, 20264.9 s
Aug 29, 20264.9 s
Sep 5, 20265.0 s
Sep 12, 20265.2 s
Sep 19, 20265.1 s
Sep 26, 20265.2 s
Oct 3, 20265.2 s
Oct 10, 20265.2 s
Oct 17, 20265.1 s
Oct 24, 20265.1 s
Oct 31, 20265.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
285 ms121 msMay 16Oct 31222 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026140 ms
May 23, 2026146 ms
May 30, 2026156 ms
Jun 6, 2026160 ms
Jun 13, 2026156 ms
Jun 20, 2026144 ms
Jun 27, 2026152 ms
Jul 4, 2026157 ms
Aug 1, 2026161 ms
Aug 22, 2026266 ms
Aug 29, 2026262 ms
Sep 5, 2026238 ms
Sep 12, 2026231 ms
Sep 19, 2026210 ms
Sep 26, 2026200 ms
Oct 3, 2026200 ms
Oct 10, 2026193 ms
Oct 17, 2026197 ms
Oct 24, 2026212 ms
Oct 31, 2026222 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ip.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ip.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. ip.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. ip.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. ip.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. ip.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. ip.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. ip.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. ip.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

ip.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

5 to fix82
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    20 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • 3,051 HTML elements

    The page has 3,051 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 82

    82/100

    Your mobile performance score is 82. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    577 KiB

    18 images could be 577 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 247 ms

    247 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 247 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    140 ms · 247 KiB

    About 247 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    290 ms · 51 KiB

    About 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 290 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google/Doubleclick Ads and Google Analytics and others), adding 347 KiB and 248 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 140 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 403 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 56 ms

    56 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 56 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 233 ms

    233 ms

    Real visitors wait 233 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 52% slower for real visitors

    +52%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 140 ms to 222 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.205

    0.205

    The layout shifts by 0.205 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.1 s to 5.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “IP.com delivers the corpus-grounded, scored, citable intell…”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 110 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix52
  • Page weight: 16.4 MB in 118 requests

    16.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.4 MB in 118 requests on a phone: media 9.4 MB (1), images 5.9 MB (65) and scripts 605 KiB (24). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 38 images in older formats

    38 images (5.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Defensive-Publishing-Book-Cover-2048x2023-1-768x759.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 11 images below the first screen load straight away

    11 images further down the page (858 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.65 g of CO₂e: 558.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8993
  • 30 text elements with low contrast

    30 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (3 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 69 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9283
  • Title is long (67 characters)

    Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “AI-Powered IP Intelligence Across the Innovation Lifecycle | IP.com”.

  • Meta description is long (234 characters)

    Your meta description is 234 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 19 links with vague text

    19 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 158 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 158 pages on ip.com and 11 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The AI Behind Every Defensible IP Decision.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://ip.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ip.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,678 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 49 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10087
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://bsky.app/profile/ipdotcom.bsky.social (404).

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ip.com).

  • Valid certificate (97 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · GeoTrust EV RSA CA G2 verifies for ip.com and is valid for another 97 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://ip.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • DNSSEC is off

    ip.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

3 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    ip.com was registered in Jul 1998 through Tucows Domains Inc.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only digicert.com, letsencrypt.org, geotrust.com and comodoca.com to issue certificates for ip.com, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

  • Registered until Jun 2030

    ip.com is registered until Jun 2030.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,151 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,151 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 25 calls to action

    The homepage has 25 calls to action, for example “Download”, “Contact Us” and “Book a Demo”.

  • 21 short forms

    21 short forms (7 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 ip4:23.21.109.197 ip4:23.21.109.212 ip4:147.160.167.0/26 include:_spf.fortimailcloud.com include:aspmx.pardot.co…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “s1”, “s2” and “dkim”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
AWS

Company

Employees
61

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on ip.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
ip.com website review: scores and fixes | Programmable