Website review, no card needed
kent.ca website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202649 issues · 103 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on kent.ca, 24 of them high impact, across 103 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74C- #55,925 of 80,927 reviewed websitesbeats 27%
- #30,987 of 39,895 online storesbeats 19%
- #270 of 601 Magento storesbeats 50%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 152 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 146 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.9 s
1.3 s
1.7 s
2.2 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
3.5 s
kent.ca does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 508 KiBAbout 508 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 1.1 MB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.1 MB).
Improve image delivery
1.2 s · 959 KiB26 images could be 959 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,131 HTML elements
The page has 4,131 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Facebook and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 491 ms
491 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 491 ms of main-thread work and 655 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 474 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Hotjar adds 349 ms
349 msHotjar costs a phone 349 ms of main-thread work and 440 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 43 KiBAbout 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 195 ms
195 msYour server sent the HTML in 195 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors wait 5.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors wait 3.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.7 s
17.7 sYour largest element takes 17.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Weekly Flyer This Week's Top Deals! View Flyer”.
Time to Interactive: 22.6 s
22.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 22.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.9 s
8.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 701 ms
701 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 701 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s
2.5 sThe first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 146 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 187 ms
187 msReal visitors wait 187 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 149 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 149 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (66), scripts 1.5 MB (42) and other files 421 KiB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (614 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
19 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Same-Day_Delivery-1015.png at 400 px wide, shown at 107 px. Resized copies would save about 19 KiB.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.35 g of CO₂e: 161.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (20 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
15 tap targets too small
15 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).
1 checks passed
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 9 failed. 6 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (22 characters)
Your title is only 22 characters: “Kent Building Supplies”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
984 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 984 pages on kent.ca and 4 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 142 characters
Your meta description is 142 characters: “Shop kent.ca, Atlantic Canada's leading home improvement chain. Discover our flyers and offers. Shop online, ship to yo…”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kent.ca/media/sitemap/kent_b2c_french_sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
11%A phone browser shows 939 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 103. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 50 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
No Content-Security-Policy
No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
1 link through redirect chains
1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://kent.ca/en/stores/store/redirect/___store/fr/uenc/aHR0cHM6Ly9rZW50LmNhL2ZyLw~~/___from_store/en/.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
Deprecated X-XSS-Protection
X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
7 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (kent.ca).
Valid certificate (48 days left)
The certificate from GlobalSign nv-sa · GlobalSign Atlas R46 DV TLS CA 2026 Q3 verifies for kent.ca and is valid for another 48 days.
Protected from clickjacking
X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.
HSTS enabled
Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.
http:// redirects to https
http://kent.ca redirects to the secure version.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
All 42 links work
All 42 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 2 external) answered without errors.
Domain and trust
Domain expires in 81 days
kent.ca is registered until Jan 2027. Make sure auto-renew is on and the card on file is current.
No CAA record
kent.ca has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
kent.ca's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
1 checks passed
Domain is 25 years old
25 yearskent.ca was registered in Nov 2000 through Bell Canada. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 939 words of copy
The homepage carries about 939 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Bring Home the Holiday Magic Shop Now” and “Shop Now”.
185 calls to action
The homepage has 185 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “Order Status” and “Buy Canadian”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Email authentication
DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)
DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be kent.ca is still delivered. Reports are on, so moving to quarantine is the next step.
Email authentication score: 70/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
2 checks passed
SPF in place (~all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:6m3iwugzv.spf.checkpoint-spf.com ~all”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Magento
- Analytics
- Hotjar
- Hosting
- Imperva
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on kent.ca, including 21 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.