Website review, no card needed
kenzai-navi.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202652 issues · 88 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on kenzai-navi.com, 19 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 135 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.2 s
4.0 s
4.8 s
5.6 s
6.4 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 6.7 MB96 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
8.8 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 8.8 s.
Reduce unused CSS
2.9 s · 543 KiBAbout 543 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 51). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
3.7 MB34 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 1.7 MBAbout 1.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Adobe TypeKit and Google Maps and others), adding 4.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
600 ms · 114 KiB114 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Adobe TypeKit adds 237 ms
237 msAdobe TypeKit costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 3.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 454 ms
454 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 454 ms of main-thread work and 517 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,388 HTML elements
The page has 2,388 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Document request latency
189 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Minify JavaScript
186 KiB186 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 584 ms
584 msYour server sent the HTML in 584 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 12.3 s
12.3 sThe first text or image appears after 12.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.1 s
13.1 sYour largest element takes 13.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “お客様ごとに最適なご遺体の安置環境を提案「おくりこ」 NEW”.
Speed Index: 17.9 s
17.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 60.2 s
60.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 60.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 495 ms
495 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 495 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
37 images without width and height
37 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.3 MB in 167 requests
12.3 MBYour homepage downloads 12.3 MB in 167 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (60), other files 3.4 MB (16) and scripts 2.6 MB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
ホームページトップ広告用.jpg weighs 1.1 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images far larger than shown
709 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2054_18722_1792379067.jpg at 680 px wide, shown at 60 px. Resized copies would save about 709 KiB.
30 images in older formats
30 images (4.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
18 images below the first screen load straight away
18 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.50 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.50 g of CO₂e: 419.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
11 links without text
11 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “【建材ナビ】建築材料・建築資材専門の検索サイト”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.kenzai-navi.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
685 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 685 pages on kenzai-navi.com and 23 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 85 characters
Your meta description is 85 characters: “建材ナビはお客様と業者間を結ぶ建築・建材専門の検索サイトです。800社を超えるメーカーの製品を200以上のカテゴリーに分類し比較検討できます。資料請求にも対応しています。”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “建材ナビは800社を超えるメーカーの製品を200以上のカテゴリーに分類した建築材料専門の検索サイトです。”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.kenzai-navi.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/mailmag.php is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.kenzai-navi.com/categories all use the title “【建材ナビ】建築材料・建築資材専門の検索サイト”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages share a meta description
https://www.kenzai-navi.com/favorites, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/request and https://www.kenzai-navi.com/categories use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/topinfo/qa.php, whose canonical is https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/topinfo/qa.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
11 pages with very little text
https://www.kenzai-navi.com/guide2, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/favorites, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/request, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/topinfo/whatis.php, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/topinfo/howto.php and https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/topinfo/qa.php and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.kenzai-navi.com/guide2, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/favorites, https://www.kenzai-navi.com/request and https://www.kenzai-navi.com/info/mailmag.php took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 198 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Every page has a meta description
All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
No mobile viewport
No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to apply style from 'https://www.kenzai-navi.com/js/waslidemenu/css/waslidemenu.css?1793169044' because its MIM…”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
69 of 69 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 22 words
The homepage has only about 22 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “JAPAN SHOP”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kenzai-navi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- SAKURA Internet Inc.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on kenzai-navi.com, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.