Website review, no card needed
kerjayagroup.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202640 issues · 78 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on kerjayagroup.com, 11 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.5 s
2.2 s
3.0 s
3.7 s
4.5 s
5.2 s
5.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.9 s · 6.8 MB72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.8 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.7 s8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.7 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.5 s · 386 KiBAbout 386 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Maps and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
1.3 MB15 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 64). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
920 KiBAbout 920 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
YouTube adds 806 ms
806 msYouTube costs a phone 806 ms of main-thread work and 972 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Maps adds 409 ms
409 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 480 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 291 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Document request latency
28 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 226 ms
226 msYour server sent the HTML in 226 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 33.4 s
33.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.5 s
12.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sYour largest element takes 5.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Together, we can.”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.6 s).
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
61 images without width and height
61 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 565 ms
565 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 565 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.6 MB in 111 requests
8.6 MBYour homepage downloads 8.6 MB in 111 requests on a phone: images 6.2 MB (49), scripts 1.7 MB (35) and stylesheets 360 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.44 g of CO₂e: 292.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
9 buttons without a name
9 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 43 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
5 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 7 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 5 passed and 2 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “Kerjaya Prospek Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://kerjayagroup.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at kerjayagroup.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
37 internal links, 27 external
The homepage links to 37 pages on kerjayagroup.com and 27 external pages.
1 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Together, we can.”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://kerjayagroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
7 pages share a title
/, https://kerjayagroup.com/about.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/bod.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_structure.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_info.php and https://kerjayagroup.com/construction.php and 1 other all use the title “Kerjaya Prospek Group”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
https://kerjayagroup.com/about.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/bod.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_structure.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_info.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/construction.php and https://kerjayagroup.com/property.php have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
https://kerjayagroup.com/about.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/bod.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_structure.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_info.php, https://kerjayagroup.com/construction.php and https://kerjayagroup.com/property.php have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://kerjayagroup.com/corporate_structure.php has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 13 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 15 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 654 words of copy
The homepage carries about 654 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Information Request”, “IR Contact” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kerjayagroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Alibaba Cloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on kerjayagroup.com, including 17 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.