Website review, no card needed
knifeaid.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 November 202639 issues · 93 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on knifeaid.com, 12 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 119.0 MB in 456 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #40,510 of 102,196 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #26,401 of 56,741 online storesbeats 47%
- #25,370 of 51,606 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 100 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 113 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.8 s
5.5 s
8.3 s
11.1 s
13.8 s
16.6 s
19.3 s
22.1 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 27.0 s
A phone's processor spends 27.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 14.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Hotjar adds 2.0 s
2.0 sHotjar costs a phone 2.0 s of main-thread work and 270 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,779 HTML elements
The page has 3,779 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Wunderkind and Klaviyo and others), adding 3.3 MB and 6.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
950 ms · 197 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (197 KiB).
Wunderkind adds 946 ms
946 msWunderkind costs a phone 946 ms of main-thread work and 849 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 871 ms
871 msKlaviyo costs a phone 871 ms of main-thread work and 511 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
rebuyengine.com adds 756 ms
756 msrebuyengine.com costs a phone 756 ms of main-thread work and 691 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 605 ms
605 msShopify costs a phone 605 ms of main-thread work and 618 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 621 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 371 KiB8 images could be 371 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
98 KiBAbout 98 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
67 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 67 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Duplicated JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 22 ms
22 msYour server sent the HTML in 22 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Speed Index: 23.5 s
23.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 23.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 5.6 s
5.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 5.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 32.9 s
32.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 32.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 6.0 s
6.0 sYour largest element takes 6.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 100 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 502 ms
502 msReal visitors wait 502 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s
1.6 sThe first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.055
0.055The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.055, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 119.0 MB in 456 requests
119.0 MBYour homepage downloads 119.0 MB in 456 requests on a phone: media 113.2 MB (8), scripts 2.8 MB (192) and images 1.5 MB (59). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
KNIFEAID_243-mobile-BG.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 33.7 g of CO₂ per visit
33.74 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 33.74 g of CO₂e: 4048.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
10 form fields without a label
10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Meta description is long (164 characters)
Your meta description is 164 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: logo is not an absolute URL ("https:files/Knifeaid_logo.svg")”.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
47 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 47 pages on knifeaid.com and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Knife Aid”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Knife Sharpening - Professional Mail-In Service | Knife Aid®”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://knifeaid.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://knifeaid.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,200 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://knifeaid.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://knifeaid.com/products/choose-a-mail-in-knife-sharpening-package is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages share a title
https://knifeaid.com/products/knife-sharpening, https://knifeaid.com/products/choose-a-mail-in-knife-sharpening-package and https://knifeaid.com/products/knife-sharpening-6-pack all use the title “Professional Knife Sharpening Services | Knife Aid”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
https://knifeaid.com/pages/jose-andres, https://knifeaid.com/collections/all and https://knifeaid.com/pages/what-we-sharpen have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://knifeaid.com/products/knife-sharpening, https://knifeaid.com/products/choose-a-mail-in-knife-sharpening-package and https://knifeaid.com/products/knife-sharpening-6-pack use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
9 pages without an H1
https://knifeaid.com/products/knife-sharpening, https://knifeaid.com/pages/jose-andres, https://knifeaid.com/pages/how-knife-sharpening-works, https://knifeaid.com/products/choose-a-mail-in-knife-sharpening-package, https://knifeaid.com/products/knife-sharpening-6-pack and https://knifeaid.com/pages/gift-cards and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 pages slow to respond
https://knifeaid.com/pages/how-knife-sharpening-works, https://knifeaid.com/products/e-gift-card, https://knifeaid.com/blogs/knife-mastery, https://knifeaid.com/collections/all, https://knifeaid.com/products/choose-a-mail-in-knife-sharpening-package and https://knifeaid.com/pages/what-we-sharpen and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=25076527&Ver=2&mid=2decda7e-531e-4fcb-bf68-08140f28cecd&bo=1&sid=022743d0de7311f1b8fd11dbcc802127&vid=02275f40de7311f18ae0e54e15687c6b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 764 words of copy
The homepage carries about 764 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Order Knife Sharpening” and “Shop Knives”.
18 calls to action
The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Order Knife Sharpening”, “Shop Knives” and “Order Sharpening”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 22 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
28 cookies set on arrival
28Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
55 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 55 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at knifeaid.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 20 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Consentmo Gdpr · Blockify Fraud Filter · Convert Experiences · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Hulk Contact Us Form · Rebuy Personalization Engine · Min Max Limits By Limitsify · Judge Me Reviews · Region Restrictions · Convert Web Pixel · Gdpr Backpack · northbeam.io · rechargecdn.com · pdqprod.link · amazonaws.com · retention.com · revy.io · rebuyengine.com · nfcube.com · stamped.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Agoura Hills
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on knifeaid.com, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.