Website review, no card needed

koch-glitsch.com logo

koch-glitsch.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202629 issues · 80 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on koch-glitsch.com, 15 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.2 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 244.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.0 s
May 16, 20264.0 s
May 23, 20263.9 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.7 s
Jun 20, 20263.6 s
Jun 27, 20263.6 s
Jul 4, 20263.5 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.5 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.2 s
Aug 29, 20263.3 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.6 s
Sep 26, 20264.1 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.9 s
Oct 24, 20264.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
130 ms95 msMay 9Oct 24116 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026125 ms
May 16, 2026122 ms
May 23, 2026124 ms
May 30, 2026122 ms
Jun 6, 2026117 ms
Jun 13, 2026111 ms
Jun 20, 2026110 ms
Jun 27, 2026109 ms
Jul 4, 2026110 ms
Jul 11, 2026111 ms
Jul 18, 2026110 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 202699 ms
Aug 8, 2026101 ms
Aug 15, 2026111 ms
Aug 22, 2026110 ms
Aug 29, 2026113 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026107 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026123 ms
Oct 3, 2026122 ms
Oct 10, 2026126 ms
Oct 17, 2026124 ms
Oct 24, 2026116 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of koch-glitsch.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. koch-glitsch.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. koch-glitsch.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. koch-glitsch.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. koch-glitsch.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. koch-glitsch.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. koch-glitsch.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. koch-glitsch.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. koch-glitsch.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix50
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 7,445 HTML elements

    The page has 7,445 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 541 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (541 KiB).

  • Document request latency

    1.1 MB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 57). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (FontAwesome CDN, reddit and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 818 KiB and 578 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 251 KiB

    About 251 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 182 KiB

    About 182 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    206 KiB

    3 images could be 206 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 39 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 39 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 179 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 923 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Real visitors wait 6.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 11.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.7 s

    12.7 s

    Your largest element takes 12.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “OPTIMIZED SOLUTIONS FOR MAXIMUM PERFORMANCE”.

  • Speed Index: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.9 s

    17.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.0 s to 4.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 267 ms

    267 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 267 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 7 images without width and height

    7 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017

    0.017

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 57 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 57 requests on a phone: HTML 1.7 MB (1), images 512 KiB (12) and scripts 466 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (38 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.87 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.87 g of CO₂e: 104.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9695
  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 images without alt text

    4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.koch-glitsch.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 255 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 255 pages on koch-glitsch.com and 1 external page.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Koch-Glitsch is a global leader in innovative solutions for mass transfer, phase separation, and tower internals design…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Optimized Solutions for Maximum Performance”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Innovative Solutions for Mass Transfer | Koch-Glitsch”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.koch-glitsch.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.koch-glitsch.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,128 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.koch-glitsch.com/product-catalog took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 87 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9678
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.koch-glitsch.com/.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    7 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix60
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 724 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 724 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More” and “Learn more”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Reddit Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at koch-glitsch.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on koch-glitsch.com, including 18 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25