Website review, no card needed

kurand.jp logo

kurand.jp website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202654 issues · 89 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on kurand.jp, 21 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.3 sMay 16Oct 312.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.9 s
Oct 31, 20262.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
291 ms172 msMay 16Oct 31271 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026186 ms
May 23, 2026192 ms
May 30, 2026197 ms
Jun 6, 2026200 ms
Jun 13, 2026202 ms
Jun 20, 2026200 ms
Jun 27, 2026200 ms
Jul 4, 2026200 ms
Jul 11, 2026199 ms
Jul 18, 2026202 ms
Jul 25, 2026205 ms
Aug 1, 2026208 ms
Aug 8, 2026213 ms
Aug 15, 2026214 ms
Aug 22, 2026214 ms
Aug 29, 2026215 ms
Sep 5, 2026217 ms
Sep 12, 2026225 ms
Sep 19, 2026243 ms
Sep 26, 2026259 ms
Oct 3, 2026270 ms
Oct 10, 2026277 ms
Oct 17, 2026273 ms
Oct 24, 2026269 ms
Oct 31, 2026271 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of kurand.jp (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. kurand.jp at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. kurand.jp at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. kurand.jp at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. kurand.jp at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. kurand.jp at 4.9 s4.9 s
  6. kurand.jp at 5.9 s5.9 s
  7. kurand.jp at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. kurand.jp at 7.8 s7.8 s

Speed

15 to fix25
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.7 s · 1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.0 s · 148 KiB

    15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (148 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 25

    25/100

    Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8,653 HTML elements

    The page has 8,653 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Main-thread work: 5.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 6.5 MB

    126 images could be 6.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (TikTok, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    800 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 138 KiB

    About 138 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    500 ms · 37 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • TikTok adds 383 ms

    383 ms

    TikTok costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 284 ms

    284 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 284 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 253 ms

    253 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Shopify adds 56 ms

    56 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 56 ms of main-thread work and 998 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 56 ms

    56 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 56 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 75.6 s

    75.6 s

    Your largest element takes 75.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 17.4 s

    17.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 78.4 s

    78.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 78.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.298

    0.298

    The layout shifts by 0.298 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 228 ms

    228 ms

    Real visitors wait 228 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors

    +43%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 186 ms to 271 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors

    +22%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 294 ms

    294 ms

    Real visitors wait 294 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix43
  • Page weight: 19.2 MB in 454 requests

    19.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 19.2 MB in 454 requests on a phone: images 10.9 MB (218), fonts 5.1 MB (5) and scripts 1.9 MB (105). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 26 images far larger than shown

    764 KiB

    26 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shinchan-noharahiroshi3_main_lemonsour.jpg at 600 px wide, shown at 155 px. Resized copies would save about 764 KiB.

  • 25 images below the first screen load straight away

    25 images further down the page (1.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    50_KV_SPslider_480x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (359 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.44 g of CO₂e: 653.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 7891
  • 91 buttons without a name

    91 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 134 text elements with low contrast

    134 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 44 images without alt text

    44 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 25 links without text

    25 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8581
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “クランド(KURAND)|クラフト酒のお店”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 127 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 127 pages on kurand.jp and 2 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 148 characters

    Your meta description is 148 characters: “クランド(KURAND)は、クラフト酒の世界をひらくオンライン酒屋・お酒の通販サイト。500種類を超えるこだわりのクラフト酒のすべてが、ここクランドだけで買えるオリジナル商品。日本酒・梅酒・果実酒・焼酎・ワイン・クラフトビールなど、あらゆ…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://kurand.jp/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kurand.jp/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    36%

    The HTML your server sends has 166 of the 463 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://kurand.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://kurand.jp/pages/gift, https://kurand.jp/collections/shipping-free-all, https://kurand.jp/blogs/magazine, https://kurand.jp/blogs/recipe, https://kurand.jp/blogs/news and https://kurand.jp/pages/about have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 13 pages without an H1

    https://kurand.jp/collections/ranking, https://kurand.jp/pages/gift, https://kurand.jp/collections/newproduct, https://kurand.jp/pages/outlet, https://kurand.jp/collections/all and https://kurand.jp/blogs/magazine and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 pages with very little text

    https://kurand.jp/collections/ranking, https://kurand.jp/pages/gift, https://kurand.jp/collections/newproduct, https://kurand.jp/pages/outlet, https://kurand.jp/collections/shipping-free-all and https://kurand.jp/collections/all and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5474
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://kurand.jp/.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“`<source src>` with a `<picture>` parent is invalid and therefore ignored. Please use `<source srcs…”).

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to fetch”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    139 of 139 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 463 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 463 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 31 cookies set on arrival

    31

    Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 46 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kurand.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on kurand.jp, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25