Website review, no card needed
kurand.jp website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202654 issues · 89 checks
This review found 54 issues worth fixing on kurand.jp, 21 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61D- #99,835 of 103,151 reviewed websitesbeats 3%
- #56,735 of 57,449 online storesbeats 1%
- #51,764 of 52,253 Shopify storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 186 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 192 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 213 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 270 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 269 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 271 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.7 s · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.0 s · 148 KiB15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (148 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8,653 HTML elements
The page has 8,653 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 5.9 s
A phone's processor spends 5.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
800 ms · 6.5 MB126 images could be 6.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (TikTok, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and others), adding 2.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 138 KiBAbout 138 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 37 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 37 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 483 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
TikTok adds 383 ms
383 msTikTok costs a phone 383 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 284 ms
284 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 284 ms of main-thread work and 340 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 253 ms
253 msKlaviyo costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 486 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 56 ms
56 msShopify costs a phone 56 ms of main-thread work and 998 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 56 ms
56 msYour server sent the HTML in 56 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 75.6 s
75.6 sYour largest element takes 75.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 17.4 s
17.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 78.4 s
78.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 78.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.298
0.298The layout shifts by 0.298 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user LCP: 2.8 s
2.8 sReal visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 228 ms
228 msReal visitors wait 228 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 43% slower for real visitors
+43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 186 ms to 271 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 294 ms
294 msReal visitors wait 294 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.2 MB in 454 requests
19.2 MBYour homepage downloads 19.2 MB in 454 requests on a phone: images 10.9 MB (218), fonts 5.1 MB (5) and scripts 1.9 MB (105). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
26 images far larger than shown
764 KiB26 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example shinchan-noharahiroshi3_main_lemonsour.jpg at 600 px wide, shown at 155 px. Resized copies would save about 764 KiB.
25 images below the first screen load straight away
25 images further down the page (1.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
50_KV_SPslider_480x.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
4 images in older formats
4 images (359 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit
5.44 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.44 g of CO₂e: 653.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
91 buttons without a name
91 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
134 text elements with low contrast
134 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
44 images without alt text
44 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
25 links without text
25 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “クランド(KURAND)|クラフト酒のお店”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
127 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 127 pages on kurand.jp and 2 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “クランド(KURAND)は、クラフト酒の世界をひらくオンライン酒屋・お酒の通販サイト。500種類を超えるこだわりのクラフト酒のすべてが、ここクランドだけで買えるオリジナル商品。日本酒・梅酒・果実酒・焼酎・ワイン・クラフトビールなど、あらゆ…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://kurand.jp/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://kurand.jp/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
36%The HTML your server sends has 166 of the 463 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://kurand.jp/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 pages without a meta description
https://kurand.jp/pages/gift, https://kurand.jp/collections/shipping-free-all, https://kurand.jp/blogs/magazine, https://kurand.jp/blogs/recipe, https://kurand.jp/blogs/news and https://kurand.jp/pages/about have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 pages without an H1
https://kurand.jp/collections/ranking, https://kurand.jp/pages/gift, https://kurand.jp/collections/newproduct, https://kurand.jp/pages/outlet, https://kurand.jp/collections/all and https://kurand.jp/blogs/magazine and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages with very little text
https://kurand.jp/collections/ranking, https://kurand.jp/pages/gift, https://kurand.jp/collections/newproduct, https://kurand.jp/pages/outlet, https://kurand.jp/collections/shipping-free-all and https://kurand.jp/collections/all and 9 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 89 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://kurand.jp/.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“`<source src>` with a `<picture>` parent is invalid and therefore ignored. Please use `<source srcs…”).
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to fetch”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
139 of 139 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 463 words of copy
The homepage carries about 463 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
31 cookies set on arrival
31Opening the homepage sets 31 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
46 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 46 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at kurand.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 54 issues on kurand.jp, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.