Website review, no card needed

ledico.com logo

ledico.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202648 issues · 109 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on ledico.com, 17 of them high impact, across 109 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s1.6 sMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.8 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.1 s
May 23, 20262.0 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms81 msMay 2Oct 1794 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202687 ms
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202685 ms
May 23, 202683 ms
May 30, 202684 ms
Jun 6, 202684 ms
Jun 13, 202685 ms
Jun 20, 202686 ms
Jun 27, 202686 ms
Jul 4, 202687 ms
Jul 11, 202687 ms
Jul 18, 202686 ms
Jul 25, 202684 ms
Aug 1, 202683 ms
Aug 8, 202685 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202693 ms
Aug 29, 202691 ms
Sep 5, 202690 ms
Sep 12, 202687 ms
Sep 19, 202690 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202692 ms
Oct 10, 202690 ms
Oct 17, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Live view · interaction off

Speed

9 to fix50
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.5 s

    68 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 623 KiB

    About 623 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    900 ms · 199 KiB

    About 199 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Facebook and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.3 MB and 884 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google CDN adds 518 ms

    518 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 518 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 41 KiB

    41 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    204 KiB

    24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (204 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 36 KiB

    4 images could be 36 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 161 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 173 ms

    173 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 173 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    Your largest element takes 11.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “לדיקו. אתכם מ-1965 דף הבית תחומי פעילות”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.5 s

    20.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 57% slower for real visitors

    +57%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 350 ms

    350 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 350 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix81
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 224 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 224 requests on a phone: scripts 1.6 MB (84), images 949 KiB (46) and other files 388 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    262_1473.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (298 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 126.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7488
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 14 tap targets too small

    14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 10 form fields without a label

    10 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Positive tabindex

    3 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • Skip links are not focusable.

    Skip links are not focusable. (1 element).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 9 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8577
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “חברת לדיקו בע"מ Ledico Ltd”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.ledico.com/sitemap_index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 119 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 119 pages on ledico.com and 7 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “חברת לדיקו, נציגת קונצרן Bosch בישראל, פועלת במספר תחומים: כלי עבודה, רכב, מוסכים, תעשיה, מוצרי אבטחה, בטיחות ואנרגיה.ה…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.ledico.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 3 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to /product-category/power-tools, /product-category/ledico_green and /product-category/ledico-technologies, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    /sectors, /product-category/car_multimedia, /car_systems_main, /product-category/ledico-security-technology, /product-category/ledico-lift and /blog and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 11 pages with very little text

    /sectors, /product-category/car_multimedia, /car_systems_main, /product-category/ledico-security-technology, /product-category/ledico-lift and /about-ledico and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 12 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    33 of 33 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

5 to fix63
  • 4 broken links to your own pages

    4 links from your homepage to your own site are broken, for example https://www.ledico.com/product-category/power-tools/ (503).

  • http:// does not redirect

    http://ledico.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • 1 broken external link

    1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.linkedin.com/company/ledico-bosch/ (404).

  • No HSTS header

    No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No clickjacking protection

    Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.

  • No X-Content-Type-Options

    X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.

  • No Referrer-Policy

    No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

3 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (ledico.com).

  • Valid certificate (63 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WE1 verifies for ledico.com and is valid for another 63 days.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    ledico.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    ledico.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 28 years old

    28 years

    ledico.com was registered in Jun 1998 through Domain The Net Technologies Ltd.. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Jun 2028

    ledico.com is registered until Jun 2028.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Only about 19 words

    The homepage has only about 19 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Call Now Button”.

  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Call Now Button”.

  • 4 short forms

    4 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Email authentication

1 to fix50
  • No DMARC policy

    ledico.com has no DMARC record, so nothing tells receivers what to do with mail that fails SPF or DKIM. Gmail and Yahoo require DMARC from bulk senders.

  • Email authentication score: 50/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:82.166.206.23 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1” and “selector2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 19 cookies set on arrival

    19

    Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 13 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 48 issues on ledico.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25