Website review, no card needed

leoceramika.com logo

leoceramika.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202645 issues · 89 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on leoceramika.com, 9 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: invalid ARIA attributes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.3 sMay 2Oct 171.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.3 s
Jul 18, 20261.3 s
Jul 25, 20261.3 s
Aug 1, 20261.3 s
Aug 8, 20261.3 s
Aug 15, 20261.3 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.3 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.3 s
Oct 17, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
174 ms135 msMay 2Oct 17169 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026143 ms
May 9, 2026142 ms
May 16, 2026140 ms
May 23, 2026140 ms
May 30, 2026139 ms
Jun 6, 2026141 ms
Jun 13, 2026142 ms
Jun 20, 2026142 ms
Jun 27, 2026145 ms
Jul 4, 2026145 ms
Jul 11, 2026144 ms
Jul 18, 2026143 ms
Jul 25, 2026140 ms
Aug 1, 2026142 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026154 ms
Aug 22, 2026160 ms
Aug 29, 2026163 ms
Sep 5, 2026163 ms
Sep 12, 2026165 ms
Sep 19, 2026167 ms
Sep 26, 2026168 ms
Oct 3, 2026168 ms
Oct 10, 2026167 ms
Oct 17, 2026169 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leoceramika.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leoceramika.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. leoceramika.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. leoceramika.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. leoceramika.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. leoceramika.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. leoceramika.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. leoceramika.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. leoceramika.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix71
  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 662 KiB

    5 images could be 662 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 71

    71/100

    Your mobile performance score is 71 (desktop: 69). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 956 KiB and 707 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 239 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (239 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 346 KiB

    About 346 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    600 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 434 ms

    434 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 434 ms of main-thread work and 520 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 76 KiB

    About 76 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    300 ms · 31 KiB

    31 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1,659 HTML elements

    The page has 1,659 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 190 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    23 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 905 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 110 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 11.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Your largest element takes 3.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Гаряча пропозиція плитка жовтень - Зображення”.

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 328 ms

    328 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 328 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 169 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 198 ms

    198 ms

    Real visitors wait 198 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 542 ms

    542 ms

    Real visitors wait 542 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.074

    0.074

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.074, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix69
  • Page weight: 2.6 MB in 88 requests

    2.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.6 MB in 88 requests on a phone: images 1.2 MB (39), scripts 1.0 MB (21) and fonts 180 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    300.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    47 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example logo-leoceramica-int-new.png at 1,359 px wide, shown at 191 px. Resized copies would save about 47 KiB.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.73 g of CO₂e: 87.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 6984
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    9 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 5 text elements with low contrast

    5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (9 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 9 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 87 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9282
  • Title is long (84 characters)

    Your title is 84 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Інтернет-магазин сантехніки, плитки, освітлення, підлогового покриття - Лео Кераміка”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (212 characters)

    Your meta description is 212 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 338 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 338 pages on leoceramika.com and 8 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Інтернет-магазин керамічної плитки та сантехніки Лео Кераміка”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://leoceramika.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://leoceramika.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://leoceramika.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 6 linked pages hidden from search

    https://leoceramika.com/about, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/keramichna-plytka_300, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/santekhnika_200, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/pidlogovi-pokryttja_100, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/osvitlennja_500 and https://leoceramika.com/outlet/elektrotovary_1100 are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://leoceramika.com/about, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/keramichna-plytka_300, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/santekhnika_200, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/osvitlennja_500, https://leoceramika.com/catalog/keramichna-plytka_300 and https://leoceramika.com/catalog/vanna-kimnata_301 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://leoceramika.com/payments-and-deliveries, https://leoceramika.com/news and https://leoceramika.com/contacts have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 pages slow to respond

    https://leoceramika.com/payments-and-deliveries, https://leoceramika.com/news, https://leoceramika.com/news/category/akciyi, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/santekhnika_200, https://leoceramika.com/outlet/pidlogovi-pokryttja_100 and https://leoceramika.com/outlet/osvitlennja_500 and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 36 distorted images

    36 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://static.salesdrive.me/chat-widget/assets/css/widget.css?498035' from origin 'https:…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    30 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 21 words

    The homepage has only about 21 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 15 short forms

    15 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 11 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 19 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leoceramika.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on leoceramika.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25