Website review, no card needed

leoch.com logo

leoch.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202642 issues · 93 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on leoch.com, 21 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.5 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
120 ms91 msMay 9Oct 2494 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026117 ms
May 16, 2026109 ms
May 23, 2026105 ms
May 30, 2026104 ms
Jun 6, 2026107 ms
Jun 13, 2026110 ms
Jun 20, 2026110 ms
Jun 27, 2026111 ms
Jul 4, 2026108 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026112 ms
Jul 25, 2026111 ms
Aug 1, 2026109 ms
Aug 8, 2026105 ms
Aug 15, 2026102 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 202699 ms
Sep 5, 2026104 ms
Sep 12, 2026102 ms
Sep 19, 2026103 ms
Sep 26, 2026101 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 202697 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms
Oct 24, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of leoch.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. leoch.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. leoch.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. leoch.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. leoch.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. leoch.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. leoch.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. leoch.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. leoch.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix59
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5.3 s · 3.1 MB

    33 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.1 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.7 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.5 s · 705 KiB

    About 705 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.5 s · 2.2 MB

    18 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.9 s · 373 KiB

    About 373 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 91). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Minify CSS

    300 ms · 75 KiB

    75 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 155 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 91 but mobile only 59. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 523 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 230 ms

    230 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 230 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.2 s

    17.2 s

    Your largest element takes 17.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Powering the Future with Reliable, Innovative Smart Energy …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 97 ms

    97 ms

    Real visitors wait 97 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.033

    0.033

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.033, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 53 ms

    53 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 53 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix42
  • Page weight: 11.6 MB in 61 requests

    11.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.6 MB in 61 requests on a phone: media 6.7 MB (2), images 3.1 MB (35) and scripts 1.0 MB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images far larger than shown

    1.4 MB

    11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example sustainability.webp.webp at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.4 MB.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    sustainability.webp.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (173 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.28 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.28 g of CO₂e: 393.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 6983
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (5 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (4 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (15 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 173 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 61 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9287
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 206 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 206 pages on leoch.com and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 158 characters

    Your meta description is 158 characters: “LEOCH is a global battery manufacturer providing lithium and lead-acid solutions for energy storage, critical network p…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “LEOCH Battery | Global Power & Energy Storage Solutions”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “LEOCH Battery | Global Power & Energy Storage Solutions”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.leoch.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.leoch.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,089 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.leoch.com/industries/smart-energy-solutions, https://www.leoch.com/industries/smart-energy-solutions/ai-data-center, https://www.leoch.com/industries/smart-energy-solutions/commercial-and-industrial-energy-storage and https://www.leoch.com/industries/smart-energy-solutions/residential-energy-storage took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 70 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix72
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 826 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 826 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.

  • 13 calls to action

    The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Request a Quote”, “Download” and “CONTACT US”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at leoch.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Hosting
Alibaba Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 42 issues on leoch.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25