Website review, no card needed
maidesite.es website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202638 issues · 83 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on maidesite.es, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #73,297 of 98,536 reviewed websitesbeats 22%
- #44,175 of 53,812 online storesbeats 15%
- #41,241 of 48,808 Shopify storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
780 ms · 179 KiBAbout 179 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 780 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (xcottons.com, Clarity and Shopify and others), adding 868 KiB and 510 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
547 KiB3 images could be 547 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 982 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,707 HTML elements
The page has 1,707 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
xcottons.com adds 132 ms
132 msxcottons.com costs a phone 132 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 151 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (151 KiB).
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 204 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 40 ms
40 msYour server sent the HTML in 40 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.2 s
14.2 sYour largest element takes 14.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 12.9 s
12.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 16.1 s
16.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.19
0.19For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.19 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.153
0.153The layout shifts by 0.153 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
8 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 126 ms
126 msReal visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 748 ms
748 msReal visitors wait 748 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 138 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 23% faster for real visitors
-23%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 98 ms
98 msScripts block the page for only 98 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
2 images far larger than shown
510 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 2_-_0731_-_2.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 510 KiB.
Page weight: 3.8 MB in 200 requests
3.8 MBYour homepage downloads 3.8 MB in 200 requests on a phone: images 1.9 MB (24), other files 869 KiB (86) and scripts 836 KiB (54). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (704 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit
1.09 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.09 g of CO₂e: 130.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
27 text elements with low contrast
27 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
24 images without alt text
24 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (71 characters)
Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “El mejor escritorio elevable & silla | Ergonomica Muebles – MaidesiteES”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
6 links with vague text
6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
86 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 86 pages on maidesite.es and 6 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “Maidesite te ofrece los mejores mesas elevables, sillas ergonómicas y otros muebles de oficina para crear un espacio de…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://maidesite.es/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://maidesite.es/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,017 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://maidesite.es/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://maidesite.es/pages/black-friday-2025, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
5 pages without a meta description
https://maidesite.es/collections/all, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-inicial, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-pro, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-premium and https://maidesite.es/pages/bulk-order have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages without an H1
https://maidesite.es/collections/all, https://maidesite.es/collections/marco-de-escritorio-elevable, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-inicial, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-pro, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-premium and https://maidesite.es/pages/bulk-order and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
9 pages slow to respond
https://maidesite.es/collections/marco-de-escritorio-elevable, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-inicial, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-pro, https://maidesite.es/collections/serie-premium, https://maidesite.es/products/maidesite-t1-basic-marco-de-escritorio-elevable-en-altura and https://maidesite.es/products/maidesite-th2-pro-plus-marco-de-escritorio-electrico-elevable-en-altura-doble-motor and 3 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: Goaffpro is already loaded. This message prevents duplicate loading of the script. Kindly ignore.”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 550 words of copy
The homepage carries about 550 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “[email protected]” and “Contact us”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maidesite.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Microsoft Clarity · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Impact Com · Inbox · Xcotton Guard · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Omnisend · loox.io · goaffpro.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on maidesite.es, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.