Website review, no card needed
markmywords.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 8 November 202631 issues · 73 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on markmywords.uk, 7 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 5.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
83B- #25,242 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 72%
- #16,619 of 61,859 online storesbeats 67%
- #16,121 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 65%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 693 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 623 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 591 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 575 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 587 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 598 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 617 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 627 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 632 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 639 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 638 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 691 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 756 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 723 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 717 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 688 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 656 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 627 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 591 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 597 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 582 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 595 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 586 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 579 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 581 ms |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 100 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 139 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
3.4 s
6.7 s
10.1 s
13.5 s
16.9 s
20.2 s
23.6 s
27.0 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 5.6 s
A phone's processor spends 5.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Mobile performance score: 59
59/100Your mobile performance score is 59. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and TikTok and others), adding 896 KiB and 880 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 262 KiBAbout 262 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
500 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.
Facebook adds 317 ms
317 msFacebook costs a phone 317 ms of main-thread work and 302 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 38 KiBAbout 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 303 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 262 ms
262 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 262 ms of main-thread work and 190 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
279 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (279 KiB).
Improve image delivery
108 KiB4 images could be 108 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
22 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 24 ms
24 msYour server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Speed Index: 17.0 s
17.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sYour largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 10.8 s
10.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 10.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 44% slower for real visitors
+44%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 100 ms to 139 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 437 ms
437 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 437 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors wait 0.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 128 ms
128 msReal visitors wait 128 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.6 s
0.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 291 ms
291 msReal visitors wait 291 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.7 s to 0.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02
0.02The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).
First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s
1.1 sThe first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 293 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 293 requests on a phone: other files 1.1 MB (219), scripts 1,023 KiB (46) and images 671 KiB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Mid-Year_1bd41284-b64c-476a-baf5-4ad7d52fe0e4.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.82 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.82 g of CO₂e: 98.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
52 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (270 characters)
Your meta description is 270 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
55 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 55 pages on markmywords.uk and 2 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “markmywords.uk”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “MarkMyWords - Planners, Diaries, Notebooks – markmywords.uk”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://markmywords.uk/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://markmywords.uk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://markmywords.uk/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (292 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://markmywords.uk/collections/year-2027 and https://markmywords.uk/collections/weekly-planners-y404-kopie all use the title “CALENDAR-YEAR 2027 – markmywords.uk”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://markmywords.uk/collections/notebooks-markmywords has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
https://markmywords.uk/collections/notebooks-markmywords, https://markmywords.uk/collections/stickers, https://markmywords.uk/collections/year-2027, https://markmywords.uk/collections/weekly-planners-y404-kopie and https://markmywords.uk/collections/appointment-diaries-y400-kopie have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
5 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
33 of 35 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 154 words
The homepage has only about 154 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Order Tracking” and “Contact Information”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at markmywords.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 3 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Section Factory · Restockrocket · wetracked.io
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on markmywords.uk, including 15 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.