Website review, no card needed

maximument.com logo

maximument.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202640 issues · 85 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on maximument.com, 19 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.9 sMay 2Oct 172.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.1 s
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20262.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.1 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.0 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.2 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
127 ms103 msMay 2Oct 17124 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026115 ms
May 9, 2026117 ms
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026114 ms
May 30, 2026109 ms
Jun 6, 2026106 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026113 ms
Jun 27, 2026120 ms
Jul 4, 2026117 ms
Jul 11, 2026122 ms
Jul 18, 2026115 ms
Jul 25, 2026114 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026115 ms
Aug 15, 2026117 ms
Aug 22, 2026116 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026122 ms
Sep 12, 2026120 ms
Sep 19, 2026118 ms
Sep 26, 2026109 ms
Oct 3, 2026115 ms
Oct 10, 2026121 ms
Oct 17, 2026124 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of maximument.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. maximument.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. maximument.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. maximument.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. maximument.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. maximument.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. maximument.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. maximument.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. maximument.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix21
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    28.3 s · 3.6 MB

    About 3.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 28.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.5 s

    27 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    3.0 s · 260 KiB

    About 260 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    YouTube costs a phone 2.1 s of main-thread work and 6.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 21

    21/100

    Your mobile performance score is 21 (desktop: 21). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 7.5 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 691 KiB

    9 images could be 691 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 269 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 8 ms

    8 ms

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 8 ms of main-thread work and 329 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    5 KiB

    8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 34.1 s

    34.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 34.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 50.9 s

    50.9 s

    Your largest element takes 50.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “BYE SWEET CAROLE Bye Sweet Carole is a chilling narrative-h…”.

  • Speed Index: 34.1 s

    34.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 34.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 53.5 s

    53.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 53.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.374

    0.374

    The layout shifts by 0.374 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 662 ms

    662 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 662 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 115 ms to 124 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Real visitors wait 124 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 755 ms

    755 ms

    Real visitors wait 755 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 10.0 MB in 211 requests

    10.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.0 MB in 211 requests on a phone: scripts 6.3 MB (61), images 1.8 MB (40) and fonts 797 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (767 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    457 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example until_then-keyart.png.webp at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 457 KiB.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.82 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.82 g of CO₂e: 338.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8290
  • Hidden but focusable

    7 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • Orphan list items

    Some list items are not inside a list.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Maximum Entertainment”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 2 links crawlers can't follow

    2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 88 internal links, 21 external

    The homepage links to 88 pages on maximument.com and 21 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 113 characters

    Your meta description is 113 characters: “Maximum Entertainment is a global entertainment company dedicated to crafting indie to AA video game experiences.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “LET'S GET SOCIAL!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://maximument.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://maximument.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,349 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 8 pages without a meta description

    /playtesters, /publishing, /publishing/submit-a-game, /company, /investor-relations and /investor-relations/press-releases and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 6988
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 9 distorted images

    9 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix58
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 660 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 660 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (5 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at maximument.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on maximument.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25