Website review, no card needed

miamiredhawks.com logo

miamiredhawks.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202636 issues · 80 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on miamiredhawks.com, 12 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.2 sMay 2Oct 172.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.8 s
May 9, 20262.8 s
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.6 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms99 msMay 2Oct 17133 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026129 ms
May 9, 2026129 ms
May 16, 2026129 ms
May 23, 2026128 ms
May 30, 2026124 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026110 ms
Jun 20, 2026104 ms
Jun 27, 2026104 ms
Jul 4, 2026104 ms
Jul 11, 2026106 ms
Jul 18, 2026106 ms
Jul 25, 2026112 ms
Aug 1, 2026112 ms
Aug 8, 2026114 ms
Aug 15, 2026121 ms
Aug 22, 2026128 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026138 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026130 ms
Oct 10, 2026133 ms
Oct 17, 2026133 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of miamiredhawks.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. miamiredhawks.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. miamiredhawks.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. miamiredhawks.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. miamiredhawks.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. miamiredhawks.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. miamiredhawks.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. miamiredhawks.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. miamiredhawks.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix44
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.8 s · 890 KiB

    About 890 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 729 KiB

    34 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (729 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.8 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.8 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 s · 296 KiB

    11 images could be 296 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, transcend-cdn.com and confiant-integrations.net and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 405 ms

    405 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 405 ms of main-thread work and 781 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • transcend-cdn.com adds 257 ms

    257 ms

    transcend-cdn.com costs a phone 257 ms of main-thread work and 318 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 149 ms

    149 ms

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 149 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 18 long tasks on the main thread

    18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 189 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    50 ms · 9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 124 ms

    124 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 124 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.88

    0.88

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.88 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.3 s

    17.3 s

    Your largest element takes 17.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Skyline 10-19”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.5 s

    20.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 494 ms

    494 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 494 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 133 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 176 ms

    176 ms

    Real visitors wait 176 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 660 ms

    660 ms

    Real visitors wait 660 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors

    -11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.08

    0.08

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.08, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 193 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 193 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (90), images 672 KiB (31) and stylesheets 153 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    180 KiB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example crop at 1,280 px wide, shown at 271 px. Resized copies would save about 180 KiB.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (379 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.92 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 10096
  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9280
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (64 characters)

    Your meta description is only 64 characters: “The official athletics website for the Miami University Redhawks”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 92 internal links, 23 external

    The homepage links to 92 pages on miamiredhawks.com and 23 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Miami University RedHawks - Official Athletics Website”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://miamiredhawks.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://admin.miamiredhawks.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://miamiredhawks.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler

    robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (592 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 14 pages without an H1

    https://miamiredhawks.com/sports/baseball, https://miamiredhawks.com/sports/mens-basketball, https://miamiredhawks.com/sports/football, https://miamiredhawks.com/sports/mens-golf, https://miamiredhawks.com/sports/mens-ice-hockey and https://miamiredhawks.com/sports/swimming-and-diving and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 74 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot assign to read only property 'open' of object '#<Window>'”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    82 of 88 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix80
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 515 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 515 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Buy Tickets” and “Donation Request Form”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Buy Tickets”, “Donation Request Form” and “HawkTawk Schedule”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 6 cookies set on arrival

    6

    Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miamiredhawks.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on miamiredhawks.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25