Website review, no card needed

miniso.co logo

miniso.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202651 issues · 90 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on miniso.co, 21 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s3.0 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.2 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.2 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.2 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20263.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.2 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
295 ms252 msMay 9Oct 24257 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026286 ms
May 16, 2026270 ms
May 23, 2026269 ms
May 30, 2026271 ms
Jun 6, 2026278 ms
Jun 13, 2026290 ms
Jun 20, 2026290 ms
Jun 27, 2026289 ms
Jul 4, 2026289 ms
Jul 11, 2026288 ms
Jul 18, 2026286 ms
Jul 25, 2026285 ms
Aug 1, 2026284 ms
Aug 8, 2026279 ms
Aug 15, 2026279 ms
Aug 22, 2026279 ms
Aug 29, 2026277 ms
Sep 5, 2026279 ms
Sep 12, 2026277 ms
Sep 19, 2026277 ms
Sep 26, 2026276 ms
Oct 3, 2026274 ms
Oct 10, 2026273 ms
Oct 17, 2026270 ms
Oct 24, 2026257 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of miniso.co (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. miniso.co at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. miniso.co at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. miniso.co at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. miniso.co at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. miniso.co at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. miniso.co at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. miniso.co at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. miniso.co at 4.4 s4.4 s

Speed

11 to fix48
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    6.6 s · 932 KiB

    About 932 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 s · 2.0 MB

    11 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    30 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.6 s · 294 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (294 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 46). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, vtexassets.com and Google CDN and others), adding 6.8 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • vtexassets.com adds 417 ms

    417 ms

    vtexassets.com costs a phone 417 ms of main-thread work and 5.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    610 ms · 97 KiB

    About 97 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 420 ms

    420 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 420 ms of main-thread work and 532 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 376 ms

    376 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 376 ms of main-thread work and 768 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 163 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.51

    0.51

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.51 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 9.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 32.1 s

    32.1 s

    Your largest element takes 32.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 33.0 s

    33.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 33.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 236 ms

    236 ms

    Real visitors wait 236 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 330 ms

    330 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 330 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 286 ms to 257 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix43
  • Page weight: 7.3 MB in 164 requests

    7.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 7.3 MB in 164 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (32), scripts 2.4 MB (54) and other files 374 KiB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images far larger than shown

    724 KiB

    7 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 45fe1083-783a-4568-a6c4-dc933c76ff29___b931b22e02bb199187872 at 676 px wide, shown at 180 px. Resized copies would save about 724 KiB.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (659 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.07 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.07 g of CO₂e: 248.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 8086
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Hidden but focusable

    3 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10083
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 47 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 47 pages on miniso.co and 0 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 108 characters

    Your meta description is 108 characters: “Compra en línea artículos de tecnología, productos para el Hogar, todo para tu Cuidado Personal y mucho más.”.

  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “#NoSabiaQueLoNecesitaba - www.miniso.co”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.miniso.co/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.miniso.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.miniso.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.miniso.co/termos is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    https://www.miniso.co/wishlist, https://www.miniso.co/tiendas, https://www.miniso.co/rebajas-miniso, https://www.miniso.co/harrypotter25anos, https://www.miniso.co/llevate-2-vinyl-plush-x-109900 and https://www.miniso.co/termos use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://www.miniso.co/wishlist, https://www.miniso.co/hogar, https://www.miniso.co/salud-y-belleza, https://www.miniso.co/moda, https://www.miniso.co/juguetes and https://www.miniso.co/tecnologia have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.miniso.co/wishlist and https://www.miniso.co/llevate-2-vinyl-plush-x-109900 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    https://www.miniso.co/tecnologia took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9287
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Unexpected end of input”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 28 words

    The homepage has only about 28 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 27 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at miniso.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on miniso.co, including 23 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25