Website review, no card needed

mweb.co.za logo

mweb.co.za website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202641 issues · 86 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on mweb.co.za, 11 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.1 sMay 16Oct 312.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.8 s
Jun 27, 20262.8 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.1 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Oct 31, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
303 ms252 msMay 16Oct 31258 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026270 ms
May 23, 2026272 ms
May 30, 2026274 ms
Jun 6, 2026275 ms
Jun 13, 2026272 ms
Jun 20, 2026270 ms
Jun 27, 2026267 ms
Jul 4, 2026266 ms
Jul 11, 2026266 ms
Jul 18, 2026264 ms
Jul 25, 2026266 ms
Aug 1, 2026283 ms
Aug 8, 2026292 ms
Aug 15, 2026297 ms
Aug 22, 2026295 ms
Aug 29, 2026280 ms
Sep 5, 2026278 ms
Sep 12, 2026272 ms
Sep 19, 2026271 ms
Sep 26, 2026262 ms
Oct 3, 2026266 ms
Oct 10, 2026270 ms
Oct 17, 2026269 ms
Oct 24, 2026269 ms
Oct 31, 2026258 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mweb.co.za (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mweb.co.za at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. mweb.co.za at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. mweb.co.za at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. mweb.co.za at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. mweb.co.za at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. mweb.co.za at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. mweb.co.za at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. mweb.co.za at 5.6 s5.6 s

Speed

9 to fix60
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 703 KiB

    About 703 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.0 s · 546 KiB

    15 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (546 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Reduce initial server response time

    818 ms

    Reduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 818 ms on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    800 ms

    The HTML itself could arrive about 800 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Main-thread work: 2.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Maps adds 160 ms

    160 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 160 ms of main-thread work and 393 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Server response: 918 ms

    918 ms

    Your server takes 918 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Maps, TikTok and connexone.co.uk and others), adding 837 KiB and 436 ms of main-thread time.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 226 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    192 KiB

    6 images could be 192 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    About 21 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Better Internet. Proven.”.

  • Real-user INP: 204 ms

    204 ms

    Real visitors wait 204 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 591 ms

    591 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 591 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 270 ms to 258 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 96 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 96 requests on a phone: scripts 1.7 MB (45), images 318 KiB (15) and fonts 48 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (249 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (87 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.61 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.61 g of CO₂e: 72.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8187
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    6 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (23 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 23 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Frames without titles

    4 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 8 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 10088
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 8 H1 headlines

    There are 8 <h1> headlines (“Better Starts Here”, “Better Internet” and “Better Experience”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 37 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 37 pages on mweb.co.za and 18 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “From fibre to LTE, broadband, hosting & more, Mweb is the number one choice for affordable internet packages. Sign up n…”.

  • Title: 57 characters

    Your title is a healthy 57 characters: “Mweb | Your Go-To Choice for Affordable Internet Packages”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mweb.co.za/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mweb.co.za/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mweb.co.za/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (489 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.mweb.co.za/web-hosting/capped and https://www.mweb.co.za/web-hosting all use the title “Mweb Capped Hosting”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://www.mweb.co.za/fibre and https://www.mweb.co.za/business-fibre use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.mweb.co.za/web-hosting, whose canonical is https://www.mweb.co.za/web-hosting/capped. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://www.mweb.co.za/premium-mailbox and https://www.mweb.co.za/web-hosting took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 38 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “useAuth: No JWT and RT received”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 319 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 319 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mweb.co.za, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Africa Networks (Pty) Ltd - Web Africa Networks (Pty) Ltd

Company

Founded
1997
Headquarters
Cape Town

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on mweb.co.za, including 17 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25