Website review, no card needed

mysortimo.de logo

mysortimo.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202636 issues · 86 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on mysortimo.de, 18 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.3 s1.8 sMay 16Oct 311.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.0 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
104 ms93 msMay 16Oct 3198 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202694 ms
May 23, 202696 ms
May 30, 202697 ms
Jun 6, 202698 ms
Jun 13, 202699 ms
Jun 20, 202699 ms
Jun 27, 202697 ms
Jul 4, 2026101 ms
Jul 11, 2026102 ms
Jul 18, 2026102 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 202698 ms
Aug 8, 202697 ms
Aug 15, 202699 ms
Aug 22, 2026102 ms
Aug 29, 2026100 ms
Sep 5, 2026100 ms
Sep 12, 202698 ms
Sep 19, 202697 ms
Sep 26, 202697 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 202699 ms
Oct 24, 2026100 ms
Oct 31, 202698 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of mysortimo.de (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. mysortimo.de at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. mysortimo.de at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. mysortimo.de at 2.3 s2.3 s
  4. mysortimo.de at 3.1 s3.1 s
  5. mysortimo.de at 3.9 s3.9 s
  6. mysortimo.de at 4.6 s4.6 s
  7. mysortimo.de at 5.4 s5.4 s
  8. mysortimo.de at 6.2 s6.2 s

Speed

8 to fix63
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.8 s · 858 KiB

    About 858 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.5 s · 897 KiB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (897 KiB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.8 s · 451 KiB

    7 images could be 451 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 158 KiB

    About 158 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • 3,200 HTML elements

    The page has 3,200 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 206 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (consentmanager.net, Hubspot and Adobe TypeKit), adding 196 KiB and 180 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 716 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 513 ms

    513 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 513 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.1 s

    25.1 s

    Your largest element takes 25.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Ladder handling made easy –the new Sortimo Rear ladder…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 28.3 s

    28.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 28.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 98 ms

    98 ms

    Real visitors wait 98 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 390 ms

    390 ms

    Real visitors wait 390 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 111 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 5.9 MB in 72 requests

    5.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.9 MB in 72 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (38), scripts 1.8 MB (15) and fonts 528 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Vorschaubild-2023-02-FR-Sortimo-Effizienz-Video-FINAL.00-00- weighs 1.4 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    1.6 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Vorschaubild-2023-02-FR-Sortimo-Effizienz-Video-FINAL.00-00- at 3,840 px wide, shown at 370 px. Resized copies would save about 1.6 MB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 6 images below the first screen load straight away

    6 images further down the page (1.9 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.67 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.67 g of CO₂e: 200.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7789
  • 10 buttons without a name

    10 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 15 text elements with low contrast

    15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7782
  • robots.txt blocks all crawlers

    Your robots.txt disallows the whole site for every crawler, so search engines are told to stay out.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 576 internal links, 27 external

    The homepage links to 576 pages on mysortimo.de and 27 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 128 characters

    Your meta description is 128 characters: “Trust the market leader! Find professional van racking systems, load securing systems and mobile transport solutions at…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Sortimo van rackings. Perfect your professionalism.”.

  • Title: 48 characters

    Your title is a healthy 48 characters: “Sortimo | van racking & services for mobile work”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.mysortimo.de/en/.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.mysortimo.de/de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix65
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.mysortimo.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,456 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 193 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 11 small tap targets

    11 of 33 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <svg> attribute height: Expected length, "87,95".”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 788 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 788 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Inquire now”.

  • 59 calls to action

    The homepage has 59 calls to action, for example “Request a SRS”, “Configure SR5 & order online” and “Request a SR5”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: consentmanager

    A consent management tool (consentmanager) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at mysortimo.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
All for One Group SE

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on mysortimo.de, including 13 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25