Website review, no card needed

omnia.ae logo

omnia.ae website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202638 issues · 78 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on omnia.ae, 18 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of omnia.ae (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. omnia.ae at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. omnia.ae at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. omnia.ae at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. omnia.ae at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. omnia.ae at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. omnia.ae at 6.3 s6.3 s
  7. omnia.ae at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. omnia.ae at 8.3 s8.3 s

Speed

9 to fix45
  • Improve image delivery

    21.8 s · 4.2 MB

    2 images could be 4.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 21.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.6 s · 1.8 MB

    45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.0 s · 828 KiB

    About 828 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 45

    45/100

    Your mobile performance score is 45 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Facebook and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Google CDN adds 553 ms

    553 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 553 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 188 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    33 KiB

    About 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 12 ms

    12 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 12 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix46
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 49.4 s

    49.4 s

    Your largest element takes 49.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We and third parties use cookies and other tracking technol…”.

  • Speed Index: 17.8 s

    17.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 50.5 s

    50.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 50.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 775 ms

    775 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 775 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 18.5 MB in 117 requests

    18.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 18.5 MB in 117 requests on a phone: images 15.8 MB (46), scripts 1.9 MB (30) and other files 551 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 12.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 17 images far larger than shown

    12.4 MB

    17 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Sitecore-Omnia-reseller-signing.jpg at 6,012 px wide, shown at 282 px. Resized copies would save about 12.4 MB.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (13.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 23 images below the first screen load straight away

    23 images further down the page (10.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.25 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.25 g of CO₂e: 630.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7789
  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 12 images without alt text

    12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (2 elements)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8580
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 46 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 46 pages on omnia.ae and 4 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 104 characters

    Your meta description is 104 characters: “We build and strengthen brands with the highest global standards in strategy, creativity and technology.”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Omnia. Your Digital and Branding Partner | Dubai | UAE”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.omnia.ae/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.omnia.ae/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.omnia.ae/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (724 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://www.omnia.ae/technology-and-digital-innovation, https://www.omnia.ae/our-work, https://www.omnia.ae/insights, https://www.omnia.ae/people-and-culture, https://www.omnia.ae/contact-us and https://www.omnia.ae/our-work/cop28-website-uae and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid or unexpected token”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,007 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,007 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Get in Touch”, “Get In Touch” and “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 25 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at omnia.ae, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on omnia.ae, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25