Website review, no card needed

ore.edu.pl logo

ore.edu.pl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202636 issues · 80 checks

This review found 36 issues worth fixing on ore.edu.pl, 14 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.3 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.1 s
Jul 25, 20264.5 s
Aug 1, 20264.9 s
Aug 8, 20265.1 s
Aug 15, 20265.2 s
Aug 22, 20265.3 s
Aug 29, 20265.5 s
Sep 5, 20265.6 s
Sep 12, 20265.7 s
Sep 19, 20265.7 s
Sep 26, 20265.6 s
Oct 3, 20265.3 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms81 msMay 2Oct 1785 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202692 ms
May 9, 202692 ms
May 16, 202691 ms
May 23, 202692 ms
May 30, 202693 ms
Jun 6, 202693 ms
Jun 13, 202694 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202691 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202683 ms
Jul 25, 202684 ms
Aug 1, 202685 ms
Aug 8, 202686 ms
Aug 15, 202686 ms
Aug 22, 202686 ms
Aug 29, 202685 ms
Sep 5, 202685 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202685 ms
Sep 26, 202685 ms
Oct 3, 202685 ms
Oct 10, 202686 ms
Oct 17, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of ore.edu.pl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ore.edu.pl at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. ore.edu.pl at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. ore.edu.pl at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. ore.edu.pl at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. ore.edu.pl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. ore.edu.pl at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. ore.edu.pl at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. ore.edu.pl at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

7 to fix57
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.0 s · 4.7 MB

    63 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.7 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 693 KiB

    About 693 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • 3,867 HTML elements

    The page has 3,867 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 1.3 MB

    12 images could be 1.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 61 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 61 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Fonts and others), adding 454 KiB and 326 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 141 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    100 KiB

    About 100 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 391 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 253 ms

    253 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 253 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    Your largest element takes 12.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Znajdź informacje o szkoleniach i programach Szybko znajdź …”.

  • Time to Interactive: 18.8 s

    18.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 18.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s

    4.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 28% slower for real visitors

    +28%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 92 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 92 ms

    92 ms

    Real visitors wait 92 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 96 ms

    96 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 96 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 71 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 71 requests on a phone: images 3.7 MB (35), scripts 1.2 MB (28) and stylesheets 156 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 21 images in older formats

    21 images (3.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 16 images below the first screen load straight away

    16 images further down the page (2.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.49 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.49 g of CO₂e: 178.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 10097
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (95 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 95 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (16 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 62 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9279
  • 147 links crawlers can't follow

    147 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Title is short (24 characters)

    Your title is only 24 characters: “Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 1,084 internal links, 46 external

    The homepage links to 1,084 pages on ore.edu.pl and 46 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “ORE - Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji jest publiczną placówką doskonalenia nauczycieli o zasięgu ogólnokrajowym prowadzoną prz…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://ore.edu.pl/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ore.edu.pl/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://ore.edu.pl/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (5,677 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://ore.edu.pl/o-nas and https://ore.edu.pl/2023/03/o-osrodku all use the title “Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji – Ośrodek Rozwoju Edukacji”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://ore.edu.pl/2026/06/patronaty-2026, https://ore.edu.pl/2017/12/kontakt-ore, https://ore.edu.pl/projektyue, https://ore.edu.pl/o-nas, https://ore.edu.pl/2023/03/o-osrodku and https://ore.edu.pl/2023/03/nasze-dzialania and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://ore.edu.pl/o-nas, whose canonical is https://ore.edu.pl/2023/03/o-osrodku. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 199 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 22 small tap targets

    22 of 58 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,871 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,871 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ore.edu.pl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Founded
2010
Headquarters
Warsaw

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 36 issues on ore.edu.pl, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25