Website review, no card needed

packers.com logo

packers.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202649 issues · 90 checks

This review found 49 issues worth fixing on packers.com, 21 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.3 sApr 18Oct 32.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.5 s
Apr 25, 20262.5 s
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
104 ms95 msApr 18Oct 3100 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 202696 ms
Apr 25, 202697 ms
May 2, 202697 ms
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 202696 ms
May 23, 202697 ms
May 30, 202698 ms
Jun 6, 202699 ms
Jun 13, 2026103 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 2026100 ms
Jul 4, 2026101 ms
Jul 11, 2026100 ms
Jul 18, 2026100 ms
Jul 25, 202697 ms
Aug 1, 202697 ms
Aug 8, 202697 ms
Aug 15, 202697 ms
Aug 22, 202698 ms
Aug 29, 202697 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202698 ms
Oct 3, 2026100 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of packers.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. packers.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  2. packers.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  3. packers.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  4. packers.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  5. packers.com at 7.7 s7.7 s
  6. packers.com at 9.2 s9.2 s
  7. packers.com at 10.8 s10.8 s
  8. packers.com at 12.3 s12.3 s

Speed

16 to fix20
  • Improve image delivery

    23.9 s · 5.3 MB

    39 images could be 5.3 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 23.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.1 s · 2.3 MB

    95 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.9 s · 1.1 MB

    About 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 2.5 s of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.6 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.5 s · 142 KiB

    About 142 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 14.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 14.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 7.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Mobile performance score: 20

    20/100

    Your mobile performance score is 20 (desktop: 34). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3,441 HTML elements

    The page has 3,441 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google/Doubleclick Ads, Integral Ad Science and Optanon and others), adding 4.2 MB and 4.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Integral Ad Science adds 703 ms

    703 ms

    Integral Ad Science costs a phone 703 ms of main-thread work and 316 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    350 ms · 33 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 350 ms faster on a phone.

  • Optanon adds 276 ms

    276 ms

    Optanon costs a phone 276 ms of main-thread work and 277 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 274 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • usestoryteller.com adds 109 ms

    109 ms

    usestoryteller.com costs a phone 109 ms of main-thread work and 1,015 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • nfltags.com adds 139 ms

    139 ms

    nfltags.com costs a phone 139 ms of main-thread work and 371 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    42 KiB

    42 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 19 ms

    19 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 19 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 49.8 s

    49.8 s

    Your largest element takes 49.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “By clicking any of the buttons in this banner, or by clicki…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 50.2 s

    50.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 50.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.17

    0.17

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.179

    0.179

    The layout shifts by 0.179 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 9 images without width and height

    9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 116 ms

    116 ms

    Real visitors wait 116 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 368 ms

    368 ms

    Real visitors wait 368 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 11.5 MB in 357 requests

    11.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 357 requests on a phone: images 6.8 MB (101), scripts 3.1 MB (113) and fonts 733 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 3.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    828 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example gxehhenhajriavcdevti at 758 px wide, shown at 100 px. Resized copies would save about 828 KiB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (983 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.27 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.27 g of CO₂e: 391.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8692
  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (11 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (4 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (2 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (68 elements).

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 8 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 131 internal links, 68 external

    The homepage links to 131 pages on packers.com and 68 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 157 characters

    Your meta description is 157 characters: “Green Bay Packers Home: The official source of the latest Packers headlines, news, videos, photos, tickets, rosters, st…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Green Bay Packers Home”.

  • Title: 46 characters

    Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Packers Home | Green Bay Packers – packers.com”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.packers.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.packers.com/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.packers.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,557 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.packers.com/rivalries and https://www.packers.com/2027-frozen-tundra-faceoff have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 9 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.packers.com/news/index, whose canonical is https://www.packers.com/news. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 96 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7385
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 64 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 4 third-party cookies

    4 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “🚀 Failed to execute data element module core/src/lib/dataElements/customCode.js for data element identityProvider (Loc…”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,471 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,471 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Pro Shop”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Schedule”, “Pro Shop” and “Book Your Event”.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore and Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 37 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at packers.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 49 issues on packers.com, including 27 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25