Website review, no card needed

pelayo.com logo

pelayo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202643 issues · 89 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on pelayo.com, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.6 sMay 16Oct 312.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.7 s
May 23, 20262.7 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.6 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
252 ms223 msMay 16Oct 31244 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026242 ms
May 23, 2026242 ms
May 30, 2026243 ms
Jun 6, 2026244 ms
Jun 13, 2026245 ms
Jun 20, 2026249 ms
Jun 27, 2026249 ms
Jul 4, 2026248 ms
Jul 11, 2026248 ms
Jul 18, 2026244 ms
Jul 25, 2026243 ms
Aug 1, 2026243 ms
Aug 8, 2026242 ms
Aug 15, 2026242 ms
Aug 22, 2026237 ms
Aug 29, 2026230 ms
Sep 5, 2026228 ms
Sep 12, 2026226 ms
Sep 19, 2026227 ms
Sep 26, 2026230 ms
Oct 3, 2026235 ms
Oct 10, 2026238 ms
Oct 17, 2026241 ms
Oct 24, 2026243 ms
Oct 31, 2026244 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pelayo.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pelayo.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. pelayo.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. pelayo.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. pelayo.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. pelayo.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. pelayo.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  7. pelayo.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  8. pelayo.com at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

9 to fix62
  • Render-blocking requests

    3.5 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.

  • Font display

    1.0 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.0 s).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 837 KiB

    About 837 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 216 KiB

    32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (216 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 125 KiB

    About 125 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 422 ms

    422 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 422 ms of main-thread work and 743 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    354 KiB

    354 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 2,253 HTML elements

    The page has 2,253 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 796 KiB and 439 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 28 KiB

    28 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    103 KiB

    2 images could be 103 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    82 KiB

    82 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 613 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 218 ms

    218 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 218 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Your largest element takes 4.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “USO DE COOKIES: Pelayo utiliza cookies propias con finalida…”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.1 s).

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 21 images without width and height

    21 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Total Blocking Time: 219 ms

    219 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 219 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 242 ms to 244 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 199 ms

    199 ms

    Real visitors wait 199 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 793 ms

    793 ms

    Real visitors wait 793 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006

    0.006

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 135 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 135 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (53), images 425 KiB (42) and stylesheets 159 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (77 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (101 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8990
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (3 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Main landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7780
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 103 internal links, 46 external

    The homepage links to 103 pages on pelayo.com and 46 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 150 characters

    Your meta description is 150 characters: “¡Calcula online tu seguro! Descubre la Diferencia Pelayo y contrata ahora tu seguro de coche, moto, hogar, vida, salud.…”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Pelayo seguros, tu compañía aseguradora de máxima confianza”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.pelayo.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.pelayo.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,556 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.pelayo.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 12 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix75
  • 2 pages without a title

    https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-coche/inicio and https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-moto/inicio have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-coche/inicio and https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-moto/inicio have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-coche/inicio and https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-moto/inicio have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-coche/inicio and https://www.pelayo.com/calcular/seguros-moto/inicio have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9282
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.pelayo.com/.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    35 of 41 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 9-field form

    Your longest form asks for 9 fields (1 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,002 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,002 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pelayo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Orange Espagne SA

Company

Founded
1933
Headquarters
Madrid

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on pelayo.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25