Website review, no card needed

pyjamahr.com logo

pyjamahr.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 14 November 202615 issues · 71 checks

This review found 15 issues worth fixing on pyjamahr.com, 3 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: 18 text elements with low contrast. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.6 sMay 23Nov 71.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.1 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.1 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20261.7 s
Nov 7, 20261.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
142 ms108 msMay 23Nov 7125 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026112 ms
May 30, 2026120 ms
Jun 6, 2026128 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026129 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026136 ms
Jul 18, 2026131 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026126 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026118 ms
Aug 29, 2026120 ms
Sep 5, 2026121 ms
Sep 12, 2026132 ms
Sep 19, 2026125 ms
Sep 26, 2026134 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026123 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026119 ms
Oct 31, 2026130 ms
Nov 7, 2026125 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pyjamahr.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pyjamahr.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. pyjamahr.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. pyjamahr.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. pyjamahr.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. pyjamahr.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. pyjamahr.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. pyjamahr.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. pyjamahr.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix88
  • Mobile performance score: 88

    88/100

    Your mobile performance score is 88. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 277 KiB

    About 277 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    450 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 216 ms

    216 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 216 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FullStory and b3mxnuvcer.com and others), adding 429 KiB and 262 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 159 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    76 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (76 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 434 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 208 ms

    208 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 208 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 8.9 s

    8.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Your largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “World's best ATS & recruitment software designed to simplif…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.0 s).

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 125 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Real visitors wait 110 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 590 ms

    590 ms

    Real visitors wait 590 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.8 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 102 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (111 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.44 g of CO₂e: 52.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.5 MB in 62 requests

    1.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 62 requests on a phone: scripts 704 KiB (20), images 567 KiB (19) and fonts 253 KiB (5). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9294
  • 18 text elements with low contrast

    18 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 64 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 36 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9295
  • Meta description is long (190 characters)

    Your meta description is 190 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 16 internal links, 14 external

    The homepage links to 16 pages on pyjamahr.com and 14 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “10X faster hiring with AI-powered ATS”.

  • Title: 51 characters

    Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “PyjamaHR: World's Best ATS and Recruitment Software”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pyjamahr.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pyjamahr.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://pyjamahr.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,136 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix78
  • 2 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://pyjamahr.com/careers and https://pyjamahr.com/pricing declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://pyjamahr.com/careers all use the title “PyjamaHR: World's Best ATS and Recruitment Software”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://pyjamahr.com/careers and https://pyjamahr.com/ai-recruiter have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 internal pages checked

    We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Minified React error #418; visit https://reactjs.org/docs/error-decoder.html?invariant=418 for the full message or use …”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 889 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 889 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Try free for 7 days” and “Get a demo”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Pricing”, “Try for FREE” and “Try free for 7 days”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo, 8 trust badges and “4700+ businesses”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads FullStory, Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at pyjamahr.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 15 issues on pyjamahr.com, including 6 speed issues and 1 SEO issue. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25