Website review, no card needed
r2.com.vc website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202635 issues · 71 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on r2.com.vc, 11 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 230 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 231 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 254 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 262 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 247 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 235 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 249 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 267 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 267 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 68
68/100Your mobile performance score is 68 (desktop: 70). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
610 ms · 77 KiBAbout 77 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
310 ms · 59 KiBAbout 59 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 310 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 3 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3 KiB).
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 105 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
6 third-party services on the page
6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Cloudflare CDN and openfpcdn.io and others), adding 230 KiB and 38 ms of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.0 s
A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 470 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 16 ms
16 msYour server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sYour largest element takes 5.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A API não respondeu (Failed to fetch). Verifique se o servi…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).
First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s
3.7 sThe first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.2 s
5.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 5.7 s
5.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 5.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 267 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 87 ms
87 msScripts block the page for only 87 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit
0.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.14 g of CO₂e: 16.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 509 KiB in 38 requests
509 KiBYour homepage downloads 509 KiB in 38 requests on a phone: scripts 232 KiB (13), fonts 96 KiB (6) and stylesheets 80 KiB (8). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
7 images without alt text
7 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
15 form fields without a label
15 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Page is set to noindex
The robots meta tag says “noindex, nofollow”: Google is told not to list this page at all.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Blocked from indexing
Google's crawler is blocked from indexing this page.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “r2.com.vc”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“{{ form.foreigner == 1 ? "One moment" : "Um minut…”, “{{ form.foreigner == 1 ? "Welcome" : "Bem-vindo"}…” and “{{ form.foreigner == 1 ? "One moment" : "Um minut…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://r2.com.vc/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at r2.com.vc/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
22 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 22 pages on r2.com.vc and 12 external pages.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://r2.com.vc/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://r2.com.vc/corporativos has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://r2.com.vc/corporativos has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://media.r2.com.vc/uploads/2022/05/logotipo-2.svg.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to fetch at 'https://media.r2.com.vc/ultra/site/home.json?_=1792477829064' from origin 'https://r2.com.vc' has b…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
15 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
A 13-field form
Your longest form asks for 13 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 79 words
The homepage has only about 79 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
7 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at r2.com.vc, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Vue.js
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on r2.com.vc, including 8 speed issues, 11 SEO issues and 7 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.