Website review, no card needed
r4.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202640 issues · 83 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on r4.com, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 884 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 892 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 897 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 883 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 894 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 915 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 927 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 947 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 971 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 989 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 998 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 985 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 977 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 979 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 986 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 990 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 981 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 980 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 978 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 974 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 973 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 985 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 169 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 167 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 167 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 186 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 875 KiBAbout 875 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 549 ms
549 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 549 ms of main-thread work and 557 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 433 ms
433 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 433 ms of main-thread work and 741 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 282 KiB15 images could be 282 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.8 s
A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
2,536 HTML elements
The page has 2,536 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 150 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (150 KiB).
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 45 KiBAbout 45 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 101 ms
101 msYour server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 25.7 s
25.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.1 s
9.1 sYour largest element takes 9.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Una banca diferente, creada para ti”.
Speed Index: 8.7 s
8.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 791 ms
791 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 791 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 169 ms to 186 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 134 ms
134 msReal visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 429 ms
429 msReal visitors wait 429 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005
0.005The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.0 MB in 160 requests
5.0 MBYour homepage downloads 5.0 MB in 160 requests on a phone: images 2.1 MB (61), scripts 1.8 MB (43) and fonts 551 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
19 images in older formats
19 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (353 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.41 g of CO₂e: 169.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
42 images without alt text
42 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (70 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 70 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
17 links without text
17 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
6 form fields without a label
6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500% (2 elements)
Users should be able to zoom and scale the text up to 500%: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.r4.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at r4.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
10 links crawlers can't follow
10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
140 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 140 pages on r4.com and 18 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 137 characters
Your meta description is 137 characters: “Somos un banco español especializado en servicios de inversión, gestión patrimonial y mercados de capitales para los qu…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Somos un banco de inversión especializado en gestión y mercados de capitales”.
Title: 38 characters
Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Banco de inversión en España | Renta 4”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.r4.com/.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
1 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,376 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page is broken
Your homepage links to https://www.r4.com/portal, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.r4.com/abrir-cuenta has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.r4.com/abrir-cuenta took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 90 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
17 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (8 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,352 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,352 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at r4.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Renta4
Company
- Founded
- 1986
- Headquarters
- Madrid
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on r4.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.