Website review, no card needed
ratec.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202641 issues · 86 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on ratec.org, 15 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 94 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 88 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.5 s · 2.6 MB13 images could be 2.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 44
44/100Your mobile performance score is 44 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.7 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
620 ms · 788 KiBAbout 788 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 620 ms faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 657 ms
657 msYouTube costs a phone 657 ms of main-thread work and 1,004 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 426 ms
426 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 426 ms of main-thread work and 380 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.6 s
A phone's processor spends 3.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Render-blocking requests
350 ms4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 350 ms.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 318 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 128 KiBAbout 128 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
74 KiB8 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (74 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
17 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 29.2 s
29.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.0 s
9.0 sYour largest element takes 9.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “RATEC ist führender Hersteller intelligenter Schalungslösun…”.
Speed Index: 10.5 s
10.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 786 ms
786 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 786 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 866 ms
866 msReal visitors wait 866 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s
2.4 sThe first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 91 ms
91 msReal visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 88 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.034
0.034The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.034, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 105 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 105 requests on a phone: images 3.1 MB (28), scripts 1.6 MB (34) and fonts 233 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images far larger than shown
538 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example _MG_1018_sq.jpg at 1,000 px wide, shown at 326 px. Resized copies would save about 538 KiB.
7 images in older formats
7 images (1.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (1.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.45 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.45 g of CO₂e: 173.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
4 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (202 characters)
Your meta description is 202 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.ratec.org/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at ratec.org/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
179 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 179 pages on ratec.org and 20 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “MEET THE BETTER IDEAS”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Schalungslösungen vom Innovationsführer | RATEC GmbH”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.ratec.org/de/.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.ratec.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (979 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte/schalungsmagnete/spb-standard-pro-box, https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte/schalungsmagnete/euro-rtm, https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte/schalungssysteme/mst-modularer-schalungstraeger, https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte/schalungssysteme/psv-psv2, https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte/schalungssysteme/mhs and https://www.ratec.org/de/produkte/schalungssysteme/sas took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 644 words of copy
The homepage carries about 644 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ratec.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- TYPO3 CMS
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on ratec.org, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.