Website review, no card needed

raypak.com logo

raypak.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202646 issues · 87 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on raypak.com, 18 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.4 s2.4 sMay 16Oct 313.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.0 s
Jun 13, 20263.0 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Oct 31, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
89 ms74 msMay 16Oct 3182 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202686 ms
May 30, 202687 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202686 ms
Jun 27, 202685 ms
Jul 4, 202686 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202686 ms
Jul 25, 202687 ms
Aug 1, 202685 ms
Aug 8, 202684 ms
Aug 15, 202681 ms
Aug 22, 202679 ms
Aug 29, 202682 ms
Sep 5, 202681 ms
Sep 12, 202680 ms
Sep 19, 202679 ms
Sep 26, 202676 ms
Oct 3, 202676 ms
Oct 10, 202678 ms
Oct 17, 202679 ms
Oct 24, 202682 ms
Oct 31, 202682 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of raypak.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. raypak.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. raypak.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. raypak.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. raypak.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. raypak.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. raypak.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. raypak.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  8. raypak.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

11 to fix54
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    7.1 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    4.0 s · 3.0 MB

    22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.0 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    4.5 s

    42 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.6 s · 1.4 MB

    7 images could be 1.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.6 s · 294 KiB

    About 294 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.7 MB and 772 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 496 ms

    496 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 496 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 25 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 157 ms

    157 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 157 ms of main-thread work and 331 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 30 KiB

    30 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 25 KiB

    25 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 25 ms

    25 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 25 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.3 s

    23.3 s

    Your largest element takes 23.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 15.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.6 s

    24.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 82 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 69 ms

    69 ms

    Real visitors wait 69 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 111 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008

    0.008

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix35
  • Page weight: 6.8 MB in 127 requests

    6.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 127 requests on a phone: images 3.2 MB (15), scripts 2.0 MB (50) and other files 715 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Splash_BG_MAIN.jpg weighs 741 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    373 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Splash_BG_MAIN.jpg at 1,660 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 373 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (141 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 232.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7687
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9276
  • Title is long (74 characters)

    Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Raypak – Raypak Pool & Spa, Residential and Commercial Hydronic Products –”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (65 characters)

    Your meta description is only 65 characters: “Raypak Pool & Spa, Residential and Commercial Hydronic Products -”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“DESIGNED TO PERFORM BUILT TO LAST” and “DESIGNED TO PERFORM BUILT TO LAST”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 53 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 53 pages on raypak.com and 17 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.raypak.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.raypak.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.raypak.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (312 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.raypak.com/commercial and https://www.raypak.com/products/commercial all use the title “Commercial Water Heating – Raypak”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages share a meta description

    https://www.raypak.com/about-us/contact-us, https://www.raypak.com/technical-resources, https://www.raypak.com/training, https://www.raypak.com/warranty, https://www.raypak.com/products and https://www.raypak.com/pool-and-spa and 9 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.raypak.com/pool-and-spa, whose canonical is https://www.raypak.com/products/pool-and-spa. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://www.raypak.com/sustainability, https://www.raypak.com/nitek and https://www.raypak.com/crosswindv have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: Looks like your website URL has changed. To ensure the proper functioning of your banner, update the re…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 258 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 258 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More >” and “Subscribe to Raypak News”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (6 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and The Trade Desk (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at raypak.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on raypak.com, including 20 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25