Website review, no card needed
reallygreatreading.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202637 issues · 89 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on reallygreatreading.com, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Really Great Reading
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.1 s
1.6 s
2.2 s
2.7 s
3.2 s
3.8 s
4.3 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 595 KiB32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (595 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29 (desktop: 63). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 10.0 s
A phone's processor spends 10.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Hubspot and others), adding 22.1 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 313 ms
313 msVimeo costs a phone 313 ms of main-thread work and 19.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 827 ms
827 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 827 ms of main-thread work and 775 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 635 ms
635 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 635 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Hubspot adds 452 ms
452 msHubspot costs a phone 452 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 118 KiBAbout 118 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 325 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
68 KiB2 images could be 68 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 63 but mobile only 29. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sYour largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Stronger Literacy Outcomes Start With Understanding Student…”.
Time to Interactive: 26.8 s
26.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 26.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.3 s
2.3 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.3 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.1 s
9.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 139 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 121 ms
121 msReal visitors wait 121 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 685 ms
685 msReal visitors wait 685 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 23.0 MB in 148 requests
23.0 MBYour homepage downloads 23.0 MB in 148 requests on a phone: other files 18.8 MB (44), scripts 3.2 MB (48) and images 507 KiB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 6.5 g of CO₂ per visit
6.52 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.52 g of CO₂e: 782.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 31 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
51 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Home” and “Stronger Literacy Outcomes Start With Understandi…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (191 characters)
Your meta description is 191 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
128 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 128 pages on reallygreatreading.com and 20 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Literacy Outcomes & Reading Intervention | Really Great Reading”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.reallygreatreading.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.reallygreatreading.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,039 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.reallygreatreading.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 37 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
14 pages point its canonical at the homepage
https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AL, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AK, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AZ, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AR, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/CA and https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/CO and 8 others declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
15 pages share a title
/, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AL, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AK, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AZ, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AR and https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/CA and 9 others all use the title “Literacy Outcomes & Reading Intervention | Really Great Reading”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
14 pages share a meta description
https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AL, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AK, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AZ, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/AR, https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/CA and https://www.reallygreatreading.com/state/CO and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 87 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 12 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 611 words of copy
The homepage carries about 611 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Talk to Sales” and “Download the Science of Reading Toolkit”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 22 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
36 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 36 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at reallygreatreading.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Hiring
- Hiring
- 8 open roles
- Teams
- Partnerships: National Partnerships (2), Partnerships: Sales (2), Finance: Accounting (1), Marketing: Marketing Operations (1)
- Job board
- greenhouse
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on reallygreatreading.com, including 17 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.