Website review, no card needed

realm.fm logo

realm.fm website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202643 issues · 83 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on realm.fm, 7 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s621 msMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 2026863 ms
May 23, 2026824 ms
May 30, 2026827 ms
Jun 6, 2026827 ms
Jun 13, 2026784 ms
Jun 20, 2026719 ms
Jun 27, 2026719 ms
Jul 4, 2026769 ms
Jul 11, 2026716 ms
Jul 18, 2026734 ms
Jul 25, 2026789 ms
Aug 1, 2026733 ms
Aug 8, 2026715 ms
Aug 15, 2026728 ms
Aug 22, 2026730 ms
Aug 29, 2026730 ms
Sep 5, 2026796 ms
Sep 12, 2026915 ms
Sep 19, 2026869 ms
Sep 26, 2026869 ms
Oct 3, 2026810 ms
Oct 10, 2026828 ms
Oct 17, 20261.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.1 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
84 ms58 msMay 16Oct 3177 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202670 ms
May 23, 202679 ms
May 30, 202680 ms
Jun 6, 202681 ms
Jun 13, 202675 ms
Jun 20, 202670 ms
Jun 27, 202667 ms
Jul 4, 202667 ms
Jul 11, 202665 ms
Jul 18, 202669 ms
Jul 25, 202670 ms
Aug 1, 202675 ms
Aug 8, 202669 ms
Aug 15, 202662 ms
Aug 22, 202662 ms
Aug 29, 202661 ms
Sep 5, 202664 ms
Sep 12, 202673 ms
Oct 3, 202677 ms
Oct 10, 202676 ms
Oct 17, 202673 ms
Oct 24, 202677 ms
Oct 31, 202677 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of realm.fm (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. realm.fm at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. realm.fm at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. realm.fm at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. realm.fm at 1.9 s1.9 s
  5. realm.fm at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. realm.fm at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. realm.fm at 3.3 s3.3 s
  8. realm.fm at 3.8 s3.8 s

Speed

9 to fix84
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.0 MB

    55 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, website-files.com and Embedly and others), adding 4.0 MB and 900 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    480 ms · 640 KiB

    About 640 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 480 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 84

    84/100

    Your mobile performance score is 84. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • YouTube adds 566 ms

    566 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 1,019 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    656 KiB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (656 KiB).

  • website-files.com adds 233 ms

    233 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 233 ms of main-thread work and 2.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 934 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 229 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    169 KiB

    About 169 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 15.0 s

    15.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 46% slower for real visitors

    +46%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.9 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 290 ms

    290 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 290 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Your largest element takes 2.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Realm is a creator-focused digital media network with globa…”.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 77 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 669 ms

    669 ms

    Real visitors wait 669 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.008

    0.008

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.008, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix50
  • Page weight: 4.2 MB in 115 requests

    4.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 115 requests on a phone: images 2.2 MB (71), scripts 1.1 MB (16) and fonts 573 KiB (13). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (516 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    166 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 66cf90b1422c2b52c2f1c585_ruby_blink_L.gif at 685 px wide, shown at 218 px. Resized copies would save about 166 KiB.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.18 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8389
  • Input buttons must have discernible text (1 element)

    Input buttons must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 82 links without text

    82 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 89 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 10073
  • Title is short (5 characters)

    Your title is only 5 characters: “Realm”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 2 H1 headlines

    There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Our Shows” and “Press”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.realm.fm/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 12 internal links, 60 external

    The homepage links to 12 pages on realm.fm and 60 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Meta description: 103 characters

    Your meta description is 103 characters: “Realm is a leading audio entertainment company with an award-winning studio and global podcast network.”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.realm.fm/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (252 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 5 pages share a meta description

    https://www.realm.fm/advertise, https://www.realm.fm/shows, https://www.realm.fm/contact, https://www.realm.fm/jobs and https://www.realm.fm/privacy-policy use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.realm.fm/shows and https://www.realm.fm/privacy-policy have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://www.realm.fm/shows and https://www.realm.fm/contact have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 6 internal pages checked

    We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 6 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 6 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • 5 third-party cookies

    5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    79 of 79 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 230 words

    The homepage has only about 230 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact us” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at realm.fm, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Hosting
Webflow

Company

Headquarters
New York

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on realm.fm, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25