Website review, no card needed
rhfs.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202639 issues · 90 checks
This review found 39 issues worth fixing on rhfs.com, 19 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 88 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 87 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.3 s · 935 KiB58 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (935 KiB).
Improve image delivery
2.6 s · 442 KiB8 images could be 442 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.7 s24 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.7 s.
Mobile performance score: 37
37/100Your mobile performance score is 37. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 271 KiBAbout 271 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Google CDN and others), adding 795 KiB and 558 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 229 ms
229 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 229 ms of main-thread work and 355 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 37 KiBAbout 37 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 5 KiB5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 146 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 755 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.3 s
4.3 sReal visitors wait 4.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.63
0.63For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.63 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.1 s
4.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.4 s
9.4 sYour largest element takes 9.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “+GF+: Products for the Most Demanding Applications Safety, …”. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.8 s).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.757
0.757The layout shifts by 0.757 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 9.8 s
9.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 13.5 s
13.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 106 ms
106 msScripts block the page for only 106 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 89 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 89 requests on a phone: images 899 KiB (29), scripts 824 KiB (31) and fonts 252 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
7 images in older formats
7 images (619 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (45 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
14 form fields without a label
14 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (102 characters)
Your title is 102 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Fluid Control Systems - Corrosion Resistant Piping, Tubing & Pipe Fittings | Ryan Herco F…”.
Meta description is long (317 characters)
Your meta description is 317 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
11 links with vague text
11 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
6 links crawlers can't follow
6 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
229 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 229 pages on rhfs.com and 1 external page.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Fluid Control Systems & Fluid Handling Products”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.rhfs.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Corporation, LocalBusiness and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rhfs.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.rhfs.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,226 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
11 pages without a meta description
https://www.rhfs.com/pulse, https://www.rhfs.com/latest-news.html, https://www.rhfs.com/my-cart.html, https://www.rhfs.com/careers-join-our-team.html, https://www.rhfs.com/tubing-hose.html and https://www.rhfs.com/tubing-hose-insert-fittings.html and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.rhfs.com/pulse and https://www.rhfs.com/my-cart.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages slow to respond
https://www.rhfs.com/latest-news.html, https://www.rhfs.com/my-cart.html, https://www.rhfs.com/careers-join-our-team.html, https://www.rhfs.com/products.html, https://www.rhfs.com/tubing-hose-tube-fittings.html and https://www.rhfs.com/tubing-hose.html and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 193 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=32001530&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=b69e7d97-76c9-4269-85d8-c4f2835a5ff0&bo=1&sid=8776e1d0d54811f18aede9e623c87ea0&vid=87771600d54811f1b894fd5ae2f54487&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.
8 small tap targets
8 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 10-field form
Your longest form asks for 10 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 355 words of copy
The homepage carries about 355 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Login / Register”, “Contact” and “Learn More”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and HubSpot and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rhfs.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Company
- Employees
- 563
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 39 issues on rhfs.com, including 18 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.