Website review, no card needed
robertsspaceindustries.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202633 issues · 69 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on robertsspaceindustries.com, 21 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 165 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 169 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 164 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 165 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 179 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.4 s
1.9 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.8 s · 1.4 MB115 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
5.5 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 499 KiBAbout 499 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
2.1 s · 635 KiBAbout 635 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 26
26/100Your mobile performance score is 26 (desktop: 28). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.8 s
A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,822 HTML elements
The page has 1,822 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot and Adobe TypeKit), adding 239 KiB and 61 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
35 KiB35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
First Contentful Paint: 9.4 s
9.4 sThe first text or image appears after 9.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s
24.7 sYour largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Wishlist Squadron 42 Today! The year is 2945. The United Em…”.
Time to Interactive: 24.9 s
24.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.4 s
9.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.411
0.411The layout shifts by 0.411 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 451 ms
451 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 451 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 160 ms to 179 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 169 ms
169 msReal visitors wait 169 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 599 ms
599 msReal visitors wait 599 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.1 MB in 165 requests
10.1 MBYour homepage downloads 10.1 MB in 165 requests on a phone: media 5.9 MB (3), other files 2.1 MB (31) and scripts 1.4 MB (88). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit
2.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.86 g of CO₂e: 343.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (24 characters)
Your title is only 24 characters: “Roberts Space Industries”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 147 characters
Your meta description is 147 characters: “Publisher of the groundbreaking AAA space games Star Citizen and Squadron 42. Visit the official site for the latest ne…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://robertsspaceindustries.com/en/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: .
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://robertsspaceindustries.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 290 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://robertsspaceindustries.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
9 small tap targets
9 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 290 words of copy
The homepage carries about 290 words of visible text.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at robertsspaceindustries.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on robertsspaceindustries.com, including 15 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.