Website review, no card needed
rogga.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202637 issues · 78 checks
This review found 37 issues worth fixing on rogga.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 116 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
20.6 s · 6.5 MB56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.5 MB).
Improve image delivery
14.2 s · 4.7 MB11 images could be 4.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.7 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 166 KiBAbout 166 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (goadopt.io, Azure Web Services and YouTube), adding 5.9 MB and 95 ms of main-thread time.
Azure Web Services adds 0 ms
0 msAzure Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 5.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 59 KiBAbout 59 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
2 long tasks on the main thread
2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 199 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.9 s
A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 352 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.2 s
23.2 sYour largest element takes 23.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Seu endereço no litoral”.
Time to Interactive: 23.2 s
23.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.4 s
13.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 4.0 s
4.0 sReal visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 135 ms
135 msReal visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.06
0.06For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 153 ms
153 msScripts block the page for only 153 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s
1.5 sThe first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.036
0.036The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.036, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.7 MB in 102 requests
6.7 MBYour homepage downloads 6.7 MB in 102 requests on a phone: images 5.8 MB (34), scripts 434 KiB (13) and fonts 281 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
f3be6ffa-57bb-4458-84af-26b847de0ca3.webp weighs 490 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.89 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.89 g of CO₂e: 227.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
16 images without alt text
16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“16.000”, “100” and “+ de 40”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.rogga.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
9 links crawlers can't follow
9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
36 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 36 pages on rogga.com.br and 18 external pages.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 145 characters
Your meta description is 145 characters: “<div>Conheça a RÔGGA Construtora, referência em Santa Catarina! Confira nossos empreendimentos no site e encontre o imó…”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Rôgga | Conquiste o seu Imóvel no Litoral ou na Cidade”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://rogga.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (633 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
11 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://rogga.com.br/nossa-historia, https://rogga.com.br/obras-concluidas, https://rogga.com.br/nossas-linhas, https://rogga.com.br/sustentabilidade, https://rogga.com.br/venda-terreno and https://rogga.com.br/quero-vender-rogga and 5 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
Best practices
28 small tap targets
28 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
4 distorted images
4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 294 words of copy
The homepage carries about 294 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Launch demo modal”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rogga.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- As266444 3l Cloud Internet Services Ltda Epp
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 37 issues on rogga.com.br, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.