Website review, no card needed

rogga.com.br logo

rogga.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202637 issues · 78 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on rogga.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s3.1 sJul 18Oct 313.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jul 18, 20263.2 s
Jul 25, 20263.3 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.5 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.7 s
Sep 12, 20263.7 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.8 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Oct 31, 20263.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
140 ms113 msJul 18Oct 31116 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026132 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026129 ms
Aug 15, 2026124 ms
Aug 22, 2026122 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026122 ms
Sep 12, 2026124 ms
Sep 19, 2026120 ms
Sep 26, 2026119 ms
Oct 3, 2026118 ms
Oct 10, 2026117 ms
Oct 17, 2026118 ms
Oct 24, 2026116 ms
Oct 31, 2026116 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rogga.com.br (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rogga.com.br at 1.6 s1.6 s
  2. rogga.com.br at 3.2 s3.2 s
  3. rogga.com.br at 4.7 s4.7 s
  4. rogga.com.br at 6.3 s6.3 s
  5. rogga.com.br at 7.9 s7.9 s
  6. rogga.com.br at 9.5 s9.5 s
  7. rogga.com.br at 11.0 s11.0 s
  8. rogga.com.br at 12.6 s12.6 s

Speed

8 to fix63
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    20.6 s · 6.5 MB

    56 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (6.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    14.2 s · 4.7 MB

    11 images could be 4.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.7 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.7 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 63

    63/100

    Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 166 KiB

    About 166 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (goadopt.io, Azure Web Services and YouTube), adding 5.9 MB and 95 ms of main-thread time.

  • Azure Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Azure Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 5.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 59 KiB

    About 59 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 199 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    12 KiB

    12 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 352 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 23.2 s

    23.2 s

    Your largest element takes 23.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Seu endereço no litoral”.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.2 s

    23.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.4 s

    13.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Real visitors wait 135 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 116 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 153 ms

    153 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 153 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.5 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.036

    0.036

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.036, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix55
  • Page weight: 6.7 MB in 102 requests

    6.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.7 MB in 102 requests on a phone: images 5.8 MB (34), scripts 434 KiB (13) and fonts 281 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    f3be6ffa-57bb-4458-84af-26b847de0ca3.webp weighs 490 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.89 g of CO₂e: 227.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8189
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 16 images without alt text

    16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 8381
  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“16.000”, “100” and “+ de 40”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.rogga.com.br/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 36 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on rogga.com.br and 18 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “<div>Conheça a RÔGGA Construtora, referência em Santa Catarina! Confira nossos empreendimentos no site e encontre o imó…”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Rôgga | Conquiste o seu Imóvel no Litoral ou na Cidade”.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://rogga.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (633 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix0
  • 11 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://rogga.com.br/nossa-historia, https://rogga.com.br/obras-concluidas, https://rogga.com.br/nossas-linhas, https://rogga.com.br/sustentabilidade, https://rogga.com.br/venda-terreno and https://rogga.com.br/quero-vender-rogga and 5 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 28 small tap targets

    28 of 40 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • 4 distorted images

    4 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 294 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 294 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Launch demo modal”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rogga.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
As266444 3l Cloud Internet Services Ltda Epp

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on rogga.com.br, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25