Website review, no card needed
roglebk.se website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202653 issues · 91 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on roglebk.se, 23 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 140 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
10.2 s · 2.7 MB110 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.6 s · 374 KiBAbout 374 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.6 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 21
21/100Your mobile performance score is 21 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
950 ms · 627 KiB13 images could be 627 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 950 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, InMobi and datatalks.se and others), adding 1.6 MB and 525 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 325 ms
325 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 325 ms of main-thread work and 342 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 263 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
InMobi adds 162 ms
162 msInMobi costs a phone 162 ms of main-thread work and 342 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,800 HTML elements
The page has 1,800 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
shl.se adds 0 ms
0 msshl.se costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 805 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 81 KiBAbout 81 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 2.31
2.31For real visitors the layout shifts by 2.31 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.792
1.792The layout shifts by 1.792 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sThe first text or image appears after 8.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.6 s
20.6 sYour largest element takes 20.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “BB260326PA019”.
Time to Interactive: 20.9 s
20.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.7 s
10.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Total Blocking Time: 415 ms
415 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 415 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
17 images without width and height
17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 480 ms
480 msReal visitors wait 480 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.2 MB in 194 requests
4.2 MBYour homepage downloads 4.2 MB in 194 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (60), images 1.3 MB (49) and fonts 1.1 MB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
205 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 5b3ad2cb-1e54-4530-b77c-02a37520c8e9Bli medlem.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 205 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (354 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.18 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.18 g of CO₂e: 141.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Images must have alternative text (1 element)
Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
Interactive controls must not be nested (7 elements)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (10 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).
1 checks passed
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 11 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (60 characters)
Your meta description is only 60 characters: “Officiell hemsida för hockeyklubben Rögle BK från Ängelholm.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.roglebk.se/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at roglebk.se/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
87 internal links, 43 external
The homepage links to 87 pages on roglebk.se and 43 external pages.
1 checks passed
Title: 37 characters
Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Rögle hemsida Catena Arena | Rögle BK”.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Some text only appears after JavaScript runs
39%The HTML your server sends has 288 of the 740 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.roglebk.se/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Other pages
3 pages share a meta description
https://www.roglebk.se/team/ee93-ee93uy4oW/rbk1_rbk/overview, https://www.roglebk.se/team/ee93-ebbfZ9tCv/rbk1_rbk/overview and https://www.roglebk.se/team/ee93-97a6Sg1hz/rbk1_rbk/overview use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
10 pages without an H1
https://www.roglebk.se/biljetter, https://www.roglebk.se/fragor-svar, https://www.roglebk.se/foretagsytor, https://www.roglebk.se/mat-till-matchen, https://www.roglebk.se/arenakarta and https://www.roglebk.se/live and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.roglebk.se/game-stats/overview took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
24 small tap targets
24 of 67 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 740 words of copy
The homepage carries about 740 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Shop”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at roglebk.se, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Vue.js
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1932
- Headquarters
- Ängelholm
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on roglebk.se, including 22 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.