Website review, no card needed
skinlaundry.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202648 issues · 81 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on skinlaundry.com, 21 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Skin Laundry
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
60D- #100,446 of 103,185 reviewed websitesbeats 2%
- #56,935 of 57,484 online storesbeats 1%
- #51,940 of 52,312 Shopify storesbeats 1%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 402 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 400 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 396 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 378 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 351 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 346 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 342 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 318 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 312 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.0 s
4.0 s
6.0 s
8.0 s
10.0 s
12.0 s
14.0 s
16.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 621 KiBAbout 621 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.3 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.3 s.
Main-thread work: 15.1 s
A phone's processor spends 15.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 11.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 227 KiBAbout 227 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
4,067 HTML elements
The page has 4,067 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 5.1 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, clickslogistics.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 411 KiB16 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (411 KiB).
Improve image delivery
200 ms · 290 KiB9 images could be 290 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 439 ms
439 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 439 ms of main-thread work and 183 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 317 ms
317 msFacebook costs a phone 317 ms of main-thread work and 214 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
clickslogistics.com adds 327 ms
327 msclickslogistics.com costs a phone 327 ms of main-thread work and 44 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Accessibe Accessibility Overlay adds 256 ms
256 msAccessibe Accessibility Overlay costs a phone 256 ms of main-thread work and 250 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 35 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 38 ms
38 msYour server sent the HTML in 38 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.6 s
11.6 sYour largest element takes 11.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “A Month of Black Friday Our best deals of the year, one wee…”.
Speed Index: 16.3 s
16.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 16.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 9.1 s
9.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 9.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 25.0 s
25.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.3 s
3.3 sThe first text or image appears after 3.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 395 ms
395 msReal visitors wait 395 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 422 ms
422 msReal visitors wait 422 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 21% faster for real visitors
-21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 402 ms to 312 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.028
0.028The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.028, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.4 MB in 118 requests
14.4 MBYour homepage downloads 14.4 MB in 118 requests on a phone: media 10.2 MB (1), images 2.4 MB (46) and scripts 1.4 MB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (210 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit
4.09 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.09 g of CO₂e: 490.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (121 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 121 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (6 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
5 links without text
5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 1 image in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (175 characters)
Your meta description is 175 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://staging.skinlaundry.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
2 checks passed
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Laser Skin Resurfacing & Facial Rejuvenation - SKIN LAUNDRY”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
1%A phone browser shows 1,659 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 20. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.skinlaundry.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
18 small tap targets
18 of 71 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to execute 'observe' on 'MutationObserver': parameter 1 is not of type 'Node'. <anonymous>:27:17”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,659 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,659 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book Now” and “Shop Black Friday”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Segment (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at skinlaundry.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2024.
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- E-commerce
- Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Vercel
Company
- Headquarters
- El Segundo
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on skinlaundry.com, including 23 speed issues, 8 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.