Website review, no card needed

soolvit.com logo

soolvit.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202640 issues · 83 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on soolvit.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.4 sMay 30Nov 71.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.5 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.5 s
Jul 18, 20261.5 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Nov 7, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
160 ms88 msMay 30Aug 1128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 30, 2026152 ms
Jun 6, 2026119 ms
Jun 13, 2026118 ms
Jun 20, 2026109 ms
Jun 27, 202696 ms
Jul 4, 202697 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026114 ms
Jul 25, 2026122 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of soolvit.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. soolvit.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. soolvit.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. soolvit.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  4. soolvit.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  5. soolvit.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  6. soolvit.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  7. soolvit.com at 8.5 s8.5 s
  8. soolvit.com at 9.8 s9.8 s

Speed

9 to fix75
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.2 s.

  • Main-thread work: 4.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    900 ms · 8.7 MB

    48 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    7.2 MB

    24 images could be 7.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 75

    75/100

    Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    854 KiB

    About 854 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google CDN adds 410 ms

    410 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 410 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • JSDelivr CDN adds 464 ms

    464 ms

    JSDelivr CDN costs a phone 464 ms of main-thread work and 101 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 11 long tasks on the main thread

    11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 93 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    90 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    12 KiB

    About 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 359 ms

    359 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 359 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.3 s

    31.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.0 s

    11.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Your largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Soolvit Hero”.

  • Real-user TTFB: 902 ms

    902 ms

    Real visitors wait 902 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors

    +17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 110 ms

    110 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 110 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 10.9 MB in 98 requests

    10.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 10.9 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 8.3 MB (41), scripts 1.7 MB (19) and other files 471 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    787 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example profilePicture1750926971.png at 1,440 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 787 KiB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (2.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.10 g of CO₂e: 371.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9094
  • 46 text elements with low contrast

    46 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 7 links without text

    7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 5 form fields without a label

    5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9274
  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “Soolvit”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (246 characters)

    Your meta description is 246 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://soolvit.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 10 links with vague text

    10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 46 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 46 pages on soolvit.com and 7 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “UNLEASH YOUR POTENTIAL, TAKE ON CHALLENGES, SHAPE THE FUTURE!”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://soolvit.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,681 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix74
  • 1 page without a title

    https://soolvit.com/innovation-management-system has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://soolvit.com/innovation-management-system, https://soolvit.com/blogs/l-impact-des-plateformes-saas-sur-la-gestion-de-l-innovation, https://soolvit.com/blogs/crowdsourcing-et-innovation-participative-comment-mobiliser-vos-communaut-s- and https://soolvit.com/blogs/comment-instaurer-une-culture-de-l-innovation-en-entreprise- have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 pages share a meta description

    https://soolvit.com/list-challenges, https://soolvit.com/open-innovation, https://soolvit.com/talent-hub, https://soolvit.com/blogs, https://soolvit.com/glossary and https://soolvit.com/about_us and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://soolvit.com/list-challenges, https://soolvit.com/innovation-management-system, https://soolvit.com/about_us and https://soolvit.com/faq have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://soolvit.com/glossary, https://soolvit.com/webinar and https://soolvit.com/faq have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7785
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: [splide] null is invalid.”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix93
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 2,343 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,343 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “JOIN US”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “JOIN US”, “Learn more” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 21 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at soolvit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
React
Analytics
Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
SPA - Icosnet SPA

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on soolvit.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25