Website review, no card needed
soolvit.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202640 issues · 83 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on soolvit.com, 11 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
86BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 30, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 1.2 s.
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 8.7 MB48 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
7.2 MB24 images could be 7.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (JSDelivr CDN, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 75
75/100Your mobile performance score is 75. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
854 KiBAbout 854 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Google CDN adds 410 ms
410 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 410 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
JSDelivr CDN adds 464 ms
464 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 464 ms of main-thread work and 101 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 93 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
90 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Reduce unused CSS
12 KiBAbout 12 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
1 checks passed
Server response: 359 ms
359 msYour server sent the HTML in 359 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 31.3 s
31.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.0 s
11.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.2 s
4.2 sYour largest element takes 4.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Soolvit Hero”.
Real-user TTFB: 902 ms
902 msReal visitors wait 902 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 152 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 110 ms
110 msScripts block the page for only 110 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.9 MB in 98 requests
10.9 MBYour homepage downloads 10.9 MB in 98 requests on a phone: images 8.3 MB (41), scripts 1.7 MB (19) and other files 471 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images far larger than shown
787 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example profilePicture1750926971.png at 1,440 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 787 KiB.
5 images in older formats
5 images (2.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.10 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.10 g of CO₂e: 371.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
46 text elements with low contrast
46 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 49 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 4 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (7 characters)
Your title is only 7 characters: “Soolvit”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (246 characters)
Your meta description is 246 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://soolvit.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
46 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 46 pages on soolvit.com and 7 external pages.
3 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “UNLEASH YOUR POTENTIAL, TAKE ON CHALLENGES, SHAPE THE FUTURE!”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://soolvit.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,681 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://soolvit.com/innovation-management-system has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
4 pages without a meta description
https://soolvit.com/innovation-management-system, https://soolvit.com/blogs/l-impact-des-plateformes-saas-sur-la-gestion-de-l-innovation, https://soolvit.com/blogs/crowdsourcing-et-innovation-participative-comment-mobiliser-vos-communaut-s- and https://soolvit.com/blogs/comment-instaurer-une-culture-de-l-innovation-en-entreprise- have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 pages share a meta description
https://soolvit.com/list-challenges, https://soolvit.com/open-innovation, https://soolvit.com/talent-hub, https://soolvit.com/blogs, https://soolvit.com/glossary and https://soolvit.com/about_us and 4 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://soolvit.com/list-challenges, https://soolvit.com/innovation-management-system, https://soolvit.com/about_us and https://soolvit.com/faq have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages with very little text
https://soolvit.com/glossary, https://soolvit.com/webinar and https://soolvit.com/faq have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught Error: [splide] null is invalid.”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 2,343 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,343 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “JOIN US”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “JOIN US”, “Learn more” and “Subscribe”.
1 short form
A short form (4 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block and 21 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at soolvit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- SPA - Icosnet SPA
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on soolvit.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.