Website review, no card needed

spothopperapp.com logo

spothopperapp.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202638 issues · 84 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on spothopperapp.com, 14 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.3 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.2 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
97 ms84 msMay 16Oct 3185 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202693 ms
May 30, 202688 ms
Jun 6, 202687 ms
Jun 13, 202687 ms
Jun 20, 202687 ms
Jun 27, 202687 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202691 ms
Jul 18, 202692 ms
Jul 25, 202692 ms
Aug 1, 202691 ms
Aug 8, 202690 ms
Aug 15, 202688 ms
Aug 22, 202688 ms
Aug 29, 202687 ms
Sep 5, 202687 ms
Sep 12, 202687 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202687 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202687 ms
Oct 17, 202687 ms
Oct 24, 202687 ms
Oct 31, 202685 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of spothopperapp.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. spothopperapp.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. spothopperapp.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  3. spothopperapp.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. spothopperapp.com at 3.3 s3.3 s
  5. spothopperapp.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  6. spothopperapp.com at 4.9 s4.9 s
  7. spothopperapp.com at 5.7 s5.7 s
  8. spothopperapp.com at 6.6 s6.6 s

Speed

11 to fix51
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.6 s · 9.4 MB

    76 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.4 MB).

  • Main-thread work: 7.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    5.5 MB

    35 images could be 5.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts and Amazon Web Services and others), adding 8.9 MB and 491 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 262 KiB

    About 262 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 8.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 491 ms

    491 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 491 ms of main-thread work and 178 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 360 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 59 KiB

    About 59 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Document request latency

    112 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 44 ms

    44 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 44 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Speed Index: 17.6 s

    17.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.6 s

    31.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.1 s

    5.1 s

    Your largest element takes 5.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “SpotHopper powers over 20,000 restaurants with the #1 AI ma…”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).

  • Total Blocking Time: 467 ms

    467 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 467 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 85 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 386 ms

    386 ms

    Real visitors wait 386 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023

    0.023

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 9.8 MB in 81 requests

    9.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.8 MB in 81 requests on a phone: images 8.7 MB (61), scripts 837 KiB (15) and HTML 168 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 2.1 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    2.3 MB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example kan_cetin_1.jpg at 2,354 px wide, shown at 316 px. Resized copies would save about 2.3 MB.

  • 40 images in older formats

    40 images (8.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 26 images below the first screen load straight away

    26 images further down the page (5.5 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.78 g of CO₂e: 333.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7687
  • 6 buttons without a name

    6 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 35 text elements with low contrast

    35 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (2 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 24 images without alt text

    24 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (46 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 46 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one main landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one main landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 8594
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 30 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 30 pages on spothopperapp.com and 16 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 155 characters

    Your meta description is 155 characters: “SpotHopper powers over 20,000 restaurants with 99% retention—increasing revenue through higher Google rankings, custom …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Share your culinary craft with more new customers”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “SpotHopper - The #1 Marketing Platform for Restaurants”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.spothopperapp.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.spothopperapp.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,038 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix73
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    /contact-us/partner-up declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and /contact-us/partner-up all use the title “SpotHopper - The #1 Marketing Platform for Restaurants”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    /legal/terms-of-service and /legal/privacy-policy have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /careers and /contact-us have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    /contact-us has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 918 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 918 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Free Demo”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Book a Free Demo”, “Free Demo” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos, a star rating, 2 trust badges and “100+ reviews”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at spothopperapp.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on spothopperapp.com, including 17 speed issues and 2 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25