Website review, no card needed
stonexglobal.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202633 issues · 74 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on stonexglobal.com, 10 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 277 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 282 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 277 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 280 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 268 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 273 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 232 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 209 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.0 s
1.9 s
2.9 s
3.9 s
4.8 s
5.8 s
6.7 s
7.7 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.4 s · 689 KiBAbout 689 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 1.2 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 51
51/100Your mobile performance score is 51 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Google Tag Manager adds 832 ms
832 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 832 ms of main-thread work and 1,016 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
750 ms · 121 KiB3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (121 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
650 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 650 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 69 KiB4 images could be 69 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 182 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 25 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 25 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 89 but mobile only 51. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s
14.6 sYour largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “MASTERY”.
Time to Interactive: 14.7 s
14.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 770 ms
770 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 770 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 272 ms
272 msReal visitors wait 272 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 5.8 s
5.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 26% faster for real visitors
-26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 277 ms to 209 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.003
0.003The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.003, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 33.6 MB in 105 requests
33.6 MBYour homepage downloads 33.6 MB in 105 requests on a phone: media 30.4 MB (14), images 1.6 MB (24) and scripts 1.4 MB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 9.5 g of CO₂ per visit
9.53 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 9.53 g of CO₂e: 1143.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 3 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
Title is long (74 characters)
Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “StoneX: Create Your Imprint on Time | Elevating the Value of Natural Stone”.
5 H1 headlines
There are 5 <h1> headlines (“Mastery”, “Stone” and “Art”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (207 characters)
Your meta description is 207 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
17 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 17 pages on stonexglobal.com and 4 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.stonexglobal.com/page-url/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.stonexglobal.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.stonexglobal.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Other pages
3 pages without a title
https://www.stonexglobal.com/refinery/kishangarh, https://www.stonexglobal.com/corporate-governance-communications and https://www.stonexglobal.com/contact-us have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.stonexglobal.com/refinery/kishangarh, https://www.stonexglobal.com/corporate-governance-communications and https://www.stonexglobal.com/contact-us have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 8 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.stonexglobal.com/mastery, whose canonical is https://www.stonexglobal.com/page-url. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.stonexglobal.com/mastery, https://www.stonexglobal.com/art, https://www.stonexglobal.com/stone, https://www.stonexglobal.com/experience, https://www.stonexglobal.com/blogs and https://www.stonexglobal.com/refinery/kishangarh have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
7 pages with very little text
https://www.stonexglobal.com/mastery, https://www.stonexglobal.com/art, https://www.stonexglobal.com/stone, https://www.stonexglobal.com/experience, https://www.stonexglobal.com/blogs and https://www.stonexglobal.com/corporate-governance-communications and 1 other have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
8 internal pages checked
We fetched 8 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 8 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 57 words
The homepage has only about 57 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Get In Touch”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Get In Touch+91 8800029291” and “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stonexglobal.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Vercel
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on stonexglobal.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.