Website review, no card needed

suardiaz.com logo

suardiaz.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202631 issues · 82 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on suardiaz.com, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s3.4 sMay 9Oct 244.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.5 s
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.8 s
Jun 6, 20263.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.8 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20263.7 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.8 s
Aug 22, 20263.9 s
Aug 29, 20264.1 s
Sep 5, 20264.1 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.9 s
Oct 10, 20264.0 s
Oct 17, 20264.0 s
Oct 24, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
125 ms92 msMay 9Oct 24121 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202696 ms
May 16, 2026102 ms
May 23, 2026103 ms
May 30, 2026107 ms
Jun 6, 2026109 ms
Jun 13, 2026107 ms
Jun 20, 2026109 ms
Jun 27, 2026109 ms
Jul 4, 2026103 ms
Jul 11, 2026103 ms
Jul 18, 2026107 ms
Jul 25, 2026110 ms
Aug 1, 2026110 ms
Aug 8, 2026107 ms
Aug 15, 2026101 ms
Aug 22, 202699 ms
Aug 29, 2026102 ms
Sep 5, 2026101 ms
Sep 12, 2026102 ms
Sep 19, 2026104 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 202699 ms
Oct 10, 2026102 ms
Oct 17, 202697 ms
Oct 24, 2026121 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of suardiaz.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. suardiaz.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  2. suardiaz.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  3. suardiaz.com at 6.1 s6.1 s
  4. suardiaz.com at 8.1 s8.1 s
  5. suardiaz.com at 10.1 s10.1 s
  6. suardiaz.com at 12.1 s12.1 s
  7. suardiaz.com at 14.1 s14.1 s
  8. suardiaz.com at 16.1 s16.1 s

Speed

9 to fix52
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 452 KiB

    61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (452 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 440 KiB

    About 440 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Hubspot and others), adding 868 KiB and 797 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    500 ms · 219 KiB

    4 images could be 219 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 551 ms

    551 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 551 ms of main-thread work and 497 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    350 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 113 ms

    113 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 113 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Real visitors wait 6.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    Your largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (9.7 s).

  • Speed Index: 18.7 s

    18.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 18.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.5 s

    14.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 307 ms

    307 ms

    Real visitors wait 307 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 524 ms

    524 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 524 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025

    0.025

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 86 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 86 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (18), scripts 1.1 MB (26) and fonts 559 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    31 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Martensmultimedia-260617-0233-768x512.webp at 390 px wide, shown at 90 px. Resized copies would save about 31 KiB.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (164 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8391
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 28 tap targets too small

    28 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 129 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 129 pages on suardiaz.com and 11 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 135 characters

    Your meta description is 135 characters: “Suardiaz, leaders in global logistics and transportation by sea, land, and air. Get to know us and discover our history…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “SUARDIAZ Group: Logistics & transport global services”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Leaders in global logistics & transport services | Suardiaz”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://suardiaz.com/en/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://suardiaz.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://suardiaz.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,103 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://suardiaz.com/en/suardiaz-group, https://suardiaz.com/en/companies/autoterminal and https://suardiaz.com/en/companies/ddr-vessels-xxi took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    3 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 401 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 401 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 8 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at suardiaz.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Asn Xtudionet

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on suardiaz.com, including 18 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25