Website review, no card needed
suardiaz.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202631 issues · 82 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on suardiaz.com, 15 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 121 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.0 s
4.0 s
6.1 s
8.1 s
10.1 s
12.1 s
14.1 s
16.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 452 KiB61 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (452 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 440 KiBAbout 440 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 52
52/100Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and Hubspot and others), adding 868 KiB and 797 ms of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
500 ms · 219 KiB4 images could be 219 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 551 ms
551 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 551 ms of main-thread work and 497 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
350 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 350 ms).
Main-thread work: 3.4 s
A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 213 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 113 ms
113 msYour server sent the HTML in 113 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.2 s
6.2 sReal visitors wait 6.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 11.1 s
11.1 sYour largest element takes 11.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (9.7 s).
Speed Index: 18.7 s
18.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 14.5 s
14.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 307 ms
307 msReal visitors wait 307 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 524 ms
524 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 524 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.025
0.025The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.025, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 86 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 86 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (18), scripts 1.1 MB (26) and fonts 559 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
31 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Martensmultimedia-260617-0233-768x512.webp at 390 px wide, shown at 90 px. Resized copies would save about 31 KiB.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (164 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.99 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
28 tap targets too small
28 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 12 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
129 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 129 pages on suardiaz.com and 11 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Suardiaz, leaders in global logistics and transportation by sea, land, and air. Get to know us and discover our history…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “SUARDIAZ Group: Logistics & transport global services”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Leaders in global logistics & transport services | Suardiaz”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://suardiaz.com/en/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: ImageObject, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://suardiaz.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://suardiaz.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,103 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages slow to respond
https://suardiaz.com/en/suardiaz-group, https://suardiaz.com/en/companies/autoterminal and https://suardiaz.com/en/companies/ddr-vessels-xxi took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 47 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
3 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 small tap targets
4 of 18 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 401 words of copy
The homepage carries about 401 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at suardiaz.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Asn Xtudionet
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on suardiaz.com, including 18 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.