Website review, no card needed
suncore.build website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202633 issues · 76 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on suncore.build, 11 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #35,195 of 90,034 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #21,863 of 47,202 online storesbeats 47%
- #500 of 2,177 WooCommerce storesbeats 72%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 4.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 113 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s18 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
3,038 HTML elements
The page has 3,038 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Mobile performance score: 80
80/100Your mobile performance score is 80. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 576 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 727 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
263 KiBAbout 263 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
262 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (262 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics and others), adding 537 KiB and 389 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
173 KiBAbout 173 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Improve image delivery
8 KiB1 image could be 8 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 231 ms
231 msYour server sent the HTML in 231 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.7 s
4.7 sReal visitors wait 4.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.7 s
3.7 sReal visitors wait 3.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Time to Interactive: 15.0 s
15.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 15.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.4 s
9.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 88% slower for real visitors
+88%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sYour largest element takes 2.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Suncore offers high-quality construction services and is an…”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.1 s).
Total Blocking Time: 210 ms
210 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 210 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 129 ms
129 msReal visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.8 MB in 80 requests
8.8 MBYour homepage downloads 8.8 MB in 80 requests on a phone: media 5.5 MB (2), other files 1.1 MB (19) and images 931 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.5 g of CO₂ per visit
2.48 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.48 g of CO₂e: 297.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6, h2 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 59 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
9 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 12 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 9 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://site.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
159 internal links, 23 external
The homepage links to 159 pages on suncore.build and 23 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Suncore is a premier partner for heavy construction services and asphalt, concrete, and aggregates supply throughout Ut…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Building Confidence”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Suncore Construction & Materials - A Clyde Company”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://suncore.build/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization, Person and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
/company/giving-back, /products-services/mobile-batch-plant, /featured-projects and /contact have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages slow to respond
/products-services/construction, /featured-projects and /careers took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 43-field form
Your longest form asks for 43 fields (22 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
Only about 33 words
The homepage has only about 33 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
35 calls to action
The homepage has 35 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Join Our Team” and “Learn More”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Matomo.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at suncore.build, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Matomo
- Hosting
- WordPress.com
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on suncore.build, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.