Website review, no card needed

tas.edu logo

tas.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202634 issues · 89 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on tas.edu, 14 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.8 s1.7 sMay 2Oct 172.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.0 s
May 9, 20262.1 s
May 16, 20262.2 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.6 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.0 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.2 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
145 ms95 msMay 2Oct 17101 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026103 ms
May 9, 2026103 ms
May 16, 2026102 ms
May 23, 2026111 ms
May 30, 2026111 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026128 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026126 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026117 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026117 ms
Aug 1, 2026105 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026102 ms
Aug 29, 2026106 ms
Sep 5, 2026112 ms
Sep 12, 2026117 ms
Sep 19, 2026122 ms
Sep 26, 2026120 ms
Oct 3, 2026120 ms
Oct 10, 2026108 ms
Oct 17, 2026101 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tas.edu (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tas.edu at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. tas.edu at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. tas.edu at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. tas.edu at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. tas.edu at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. tas.edu at 3.8 s3.8 s
  7. tas.edu at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. tas.edu at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

10 to fix49
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.4 s · 41.3 MB

    54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (41.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    9.4 s · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    9.4 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.4 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 94 KiB

    About 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 49

    49/100

    Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 32). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Vimeo and Facebook and others), adding 52.7 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • website-files.com adds 279 ms

    279 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 279 ms of main-thread work and 47.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Vimeo adds 253 ms

    253 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 4.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 135 ms

    135 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 441 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    100 ms · 30 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    41 KiB

    1 image could be 41 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify JavaScript

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • First Contentful Paint: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 17.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.8 s

    28.8 s

    Your largest element takes 28.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “By clicking "Accept", you agree to the storing of cookies o…”.

  • Speed Index: 17.1 s

    17.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 17.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.4 s

    29.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    Real visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 282 ms

    282 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 282 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 14 images without width and height

    14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 120 ms

    120 ms

    Real visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 698 ms

    698 ms

    Real visitors wait 698 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 53.3 MB in 155 requests

    53.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 53.3 MB in 155 requests on a phone: media 40.7 MB (4), images 5.8 MB (23) and other files 2.9 MB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (66 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 15.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    15.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 15.12 g of CO₂e: 1814.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9793
  • Links must have discernible text (8 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 73 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8592
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (EducationalOrganization) but with 1 problem, for example “EducationalOrganization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 96 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 96 pages on tas.edu and 17 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “Trinity Anglican Seminary prepares future Anglican leaders with academic excellence and orthodox formation for mission …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Forming Leaders for Mission”.

  • Title: 64 characters

    Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Forming Anglican Leaders for Mission | Trinity Anglican Seminary”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tas.edu/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tas.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,185 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://tas.edu/llms.txt (5 KiB, 43 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix98
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://tas.edu/apply-now and https://tas.edu/journey use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    11 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix89
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 743 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 743 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Now”.

  • 18 calls to action

    The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Apply Now”, “Start Your Journey” and “Try A Course”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tas.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics

Company

Employees
39
Founded
1975

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on tas.edu, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25