Website review, no card needed
tas.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202634 issues · 89 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on tas.edu, 14 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 101 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.4 s · 41.3 MB54 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (41.3 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
9.4 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
9.4 s17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.4 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 94 KiBAbout 94 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 49
49/100Your mobile performance score is 49 (desktop: 32). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.0 s
A phone's processor spends 5.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Vimeo and Facebook and others), adding 52.7 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.
website-files.com adds 279 ms
279 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 279 ms of main-thread work and 47.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Vimeo adds 253 ms
253 msVimeo costs a phone 253 ms of main-thread work and 4.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 135 ms
135 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 135 ms of main-thread work and 441 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
100 ms · 30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
41 KiB1 image could be 41 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 17.1 s
17.1 sThe first text or image appears after 17.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.8 s
28.8 sYour largest element takes 28.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “By clicking "Accept", you agree to the storing of cookies o…”.
Speed Index: 17.1 s
17.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 29.4 s
29.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 282 ms
282 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 282 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 103 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user INP: 120 ms
120 msReal visitors wait 120 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 698 ms
698 msReal visitors wait 698 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 53.3 MB in 155 requests
53.3 MBYour homepage downloads 53.3 MB in 155 requests on a phone: media 40.7 MB (4), images 5.8 MB (23) and other files 2.9 MB (40). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (66 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 15.1 g of CO₂ per visit
15.12 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 15.12 g of CO₂e: 1814.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links must have discernible text (8 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 73 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (EducationalOrganization) but with 1 problem, for example “EducationalOrganization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
96 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 96 pages on tas.edu and 17 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Trinity Anglican Seminary prepares future Anglican leaders with academic excellence and orthodox formation for mission …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Forming Leaders for Mission”.
Title: 64 characters
Your title is a healthy 64 characters: “Forming Anglican Leaders for Mission | Trinity Anglican Seminary”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://tas.edu/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tas.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,185 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://tas.edu/llms.txt (5 KiB, 43 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://tas.edu/apply-now and https://tas.edu/journey use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 743 words of copy
The homepage carries about 743 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Apply Now”.
18 calls to action
The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Apply Now”, “Start Your Journey” and “Try A Course”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tas.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Company
- Employees
- 39
- Founded
- 1975
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on tas.edu, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.