Website review, no card needed

tecnofast.cl logo

tecnofast.cl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202657 issues · 114 checks

This review found 57 issues worth fixing on tecnofast.cl, 21 of them high impact, across 114 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.4 s4.0 sMay 9Oct 245.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.1 s
May 16, 20264.5 s
May 23, 20264.6 s
May 30, 20264.9 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.2 s
Jun 27, 20264.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.5 s
Jul 18, 20264.4 s
Jul 25, 20264.4 s
Aug 1, 20264.4 s
Aug 8, 20264.4 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20264.5 s
Aug 29, 20264.8 s
Sep 5, 20265.0 s
Sep 12, 20265.0 s
Sep 19, 20265.1 s
Sep 26, 20264.9 s
Oct 3, 20264.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.7 s
Oct 17, 20264.8 s
Oct 24, 20265.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
201 ms131 msMay 9Oct 24181 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026146 ms
May 16, 2026152 ms
May 23, 2026156 ms
May 30, 2026159 ms
Jun 6, 2026152 ms
Jun 13, 2026145 ms
Jun 20, 2026145 ms
Jun 27, 2026140 ms
Jul 4, 2026139 ms
Jul 11, 2026141 ms
Jul 18, 2026140 ms
Jul 25, 2026140 ms
Aug 1, 2026143 ms
Aug 8, 2026143 ms
Aug 15, 2026154 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026173 ms
Sep 5, 2026185 ms
Sep 12, 2026187 ms
Sep 19, 2026189 ms
Sep 26, 2026193 ms
Oct 3, 2026189 ms
Oct 10, 2026188 ms
Oct 17, 2026187 ms
Oct 24, 2026181 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tecnofast.cl (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tecnofast.cl at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. tecnofast.cl at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. tecnofast.cl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. tecnofast.cl at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. tecnofast.cl at 4.4 s4.4 s
  6. tecnofast.cl at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. tecnofast.cl at 6.1 s6.1 s
  8. tecnofast.cl at 7.0 s7.0 s

tecnofast.cl does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

14 to fix20
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.8 s

    69 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.8 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 799 KiB

    About 799 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.2 s of main-thread work and 841 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 20

    20/100

    Your mobile performance score is 20 (desktop: 48). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 7.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 7.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Vimeo and others), adding 10.5 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Vimeo adds 221 ms

    221 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 221 ms of main-thread work and 9.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    650 ms · 492 KiB

    6 images could be 492 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 650 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    700 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 700 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 107 KiB

    About 107 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 364 ms

    364 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 364 ms of main-thread work and 308 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 379 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    365 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (365 KiB).

  • 2,299 HTML elements

    The page has 2,299 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    32 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 32 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    15 KiB

    15 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 48 but mobile only 20. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 130 ms

    130 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 130 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    Real visitors wait 4.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.31

    0.31

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.31 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 29.8 s

    29.8 s

    Your largest element takes 29.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “WATER TANK”.

  • Speed Index: 19.5 s

    19.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 19.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 44.0 s

    44.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 44.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.3 s

    4.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 249 ms

    249 ms

    Real visitors wait 249 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 181 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.233

    0.233

    The layout shifts by 0.233 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.1 s to 5.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user TTFB: 732 ms

    732 ms

    Real visitors wait 732 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 18.5 MB in 266 requests

    18.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 18.5 MB in 266 requests on a phone: other files 8.8 MB (52), images 7.1 MB (45) and scripts 2.1 MB (95). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 7 images over 500 KB

    7 images weigh 4.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    990 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example RENDER-1_AJUSTADO-scaled-1.jpg at 2,560 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 990 KiB.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (6.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (1.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.23 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.23 g of CO₂e: 627.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 8687
  • 23 tap targets too small

    23 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (14 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (2 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 5 links without text

    5 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 104 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 12 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9290
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 107 internal links, 50 external

    The homepage links to 107 pages on tecnofast.cl and 50 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Tecno Fast: líder en arriendo y venta de oficinas, baños y campamentos modulares en Chile. Entrega rápida, llave en man…”.

  • Title: 60 characters

    Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Arriendo y venta de espacios modulares en Chile | Tecno Fast”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tecnofast.cl/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tecnofast.cl/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (778 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /tent, whose canonical is /carpas. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    /trailer-modular and /landing-industrias have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages slow to respond

    /empresa, /por-que-tecno-fast, /colaboradores, /productos, /trailer-modular and /modulo-advance took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5883
  • 18 small tap targets

    18 of 35 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “%c%d font-size:0;color:transparent NaN”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix94
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://tecnofast.cl/tent/.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

7 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (tecnofast.cl).

  • Valid certificate (87 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for tecnofast.cl and is valid for another 87 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://tecnofast.cl redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 60 links work

    All 60 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 20 external) answered without errors; 9 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    tecnofast.cl has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 216 words

    The homepage has only about 216 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Email authentication

85
  • Email authentication score: 85/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF in place (~all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and marks other mail as suspicious (~all): “v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ~all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 18 cookies set on arrival

    18

    Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • It runs WordPress 1.13.3; the current release is 7.1.3.

Stack

CMS
WordPress 1.13.3
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vultr

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 57 issues on tecnofast.cl, including 26 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25