Website review, no card needed
tecowestinghouse.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202645 issues · 106 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on tecowestinghouse.com, 18 of them high impact, across 106 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #52,019 of 80,566 reviewed websitesbeats 31%
- #29,059 of 39,626 online storesbeats 22%
- #1,003 of 2,103 WooCommerce storesbeats 46%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 89 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
7.8 s · 3.7 MB11 images could be 3.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 392 KiBAbout 392 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.4 s81 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 70). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Google Fonts), adding 790 KiB and 646 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 600 ms
600 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 600 ms of main-thread work and 646 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 247 KiBAbout 247 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 223 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 16 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 79 ms
79 msYour server sent the HTML in 79 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.3 s
25.3 sYour largest element takes 25.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Green Energy”.
Time to Interactive: 25.9 s
25.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.0 s
11.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.6 s
4.6 sThe first text or image appears after 4.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 30% slower for real visitors
+30%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 429 ms
429 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 429 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 87 ms
87 msReal visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 210 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 210 requests on a phone: images 4.1 MB (13), scripts 992 KiB (89) and fonts 216 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images over 500 KB
3 images weigh 1.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
11 images in older formats
11 images (2.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.57 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.57 g of CO₂e: 188.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
11 text elements with low contrast
11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links look like plain text
3 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.
Links must have discernible text (1 element)
Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (274 characters)
Your title is 274 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “TECO-Westinghouse | The world leader in manufacturing electric motors and generators – Th…”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Browse Our Products & Services”, “Browse by Industry” and “Browse by Need”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.tecowestinghouse.com/wp-sitemap.xml<style>, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:title, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
139 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 139 pages on tecowestinghouse.com and 5 external pages.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 80 characters
Your meta description is 80 characters: “Browse Our Products & Services Browse by Industry Oil & Gas Petrochemical Mining”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tecowestinghouse.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
5 pages without a meta description
/product-category/stock-motors/single-phase-odp-motors, /product-category/stock-motors/single-phase-tefc-motors, /product-category/stock-motors/three-phase-odp-motors, /product-category/stock-motors/three-phase-tefc-motors and /product-category/stock-motors/medium-voltage-odp-motors have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
/visit-us, /industries, /industries/oil-and-gas, /industries/petrochemical, /industries/mining and /industries/metals and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
7 pages slow to respond
/visit-us, /industries, /industries/oil-and-gas, /industries/petrochemical, /stock-motors and /product-category/stock-motors/three-phase-tefc-motors and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://array/.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 16 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Security and trust
5 insecure resources on an https page
5 resources load over plain http on your https page (for example http://Array); browsers block or warn about them.
http:// does not redirect
http://tecowestinghouse.com does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.
1 broken external link
1 link to other sites is dead, for example https://www.tecowestinghouse.com.mx/ (500).
No HSTS header
No Strict-Transport-Security header, so browsers may still try plain http first on a return visit.
No clickjacking protection
Neither X-Frame-Options nor a CSP frame-ancestors policy is set, so any site can embed yours in a frame.
No X-Content-Type-Options
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff is missing, so browsers may guess file types.
No Referrer-Policy
No Referrer-Policy header, so full URLs can leak to the sites you link to.
No Permissions-Policy
No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.
No security.txt
There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.
4 checks passed
Served over HTTPS
The homepage is served over HTTPS (tecowestinghouse.com).
Valid certificate (57 days left)
The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YR2 verifies for tecowestinghouse.com and is valid for another 57 days.
Content-Security-Policy set
A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.
HTTP/2
The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.
Domain and trust
No CAA record
tecowestinghouse.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.
DNSSEC is off
tecowestinghouse.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.
2 checks passed
Domain is 27 years old
27 yearstecowestinghouse.com was registered in Sep 1999 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.
Registered until Sep 2027
tecowestinghouse.com is registered until Sep 2027.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 90 words
The homepage has only about 90 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Request Quote” and “Request Literature”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Email authentication
Email authentication score: 90/100
Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.
3 checks passed
DMARC policy: quarantine
DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.
SPF with a strict ending (-all)
An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 ip4:208.24.16.145 ip4:34.168.176.99 ip4:208.24.16.137 ip4:208.24.16.138 ip4:18.216.7.10 ip4:18.220.12.142 ip4:10…”.
DKIM signing found
A DKIM key is published (selector “selector1”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Upkeep, stack and company
- It runs WordPress 3.7.1; the current release is 7.1.3.
- 4 plugins are behind their latest release.contact-form-7 6.1.7 → 6.2.3 · cf7-conditional-fields 2.8.2 → 2.8.3 · woocommerce 11.2.0 → 11.2.1 · duracelltomi-google-tag-manager 1.22.5 → 2.0.6
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress 3.7.1
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on tecowestinghouse.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.