Website review, no card needed

tecsup.edu.pe logo

tecsup.edu.pe website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202646 issues · 88 checks

This review found 46 issues worth fixing on tecsup.edu.pe, 21 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.8 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
133 ms109 msMay 9Oct 24128 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026112 ms
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026113 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026117 ms
Jun 13, 2026117 ms
Jun 20, 2026118 ms
Jun 27, 2026114 ms
Jul 4, 2026116 ms
Jul 11, 2026117 ms
Jul 18, 2026120 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026117 ms
Aug 8, 2026115 ms
Aug 15, 2026115 ms
Aug 22, 2026120 ms
Aug 29, 2026125 ms
Sep 5, 2026128 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026127 ms
Sep 26, 2026126 ms
Oct 3, 2026124 ms
Oct 10, 2026124 ms
Oct 17, 2026125 ms
Oct 24, 2026128 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tecsup.edu.pe (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tecsup.edu.pe at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. tecsup.edu.pe at 2.3 s2.3 s
  3. tecsup.edu.pe at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. tecsup.edu.pe at 4.6 s4.6 s
  5. tecsup.edu.pe at 5.7 s5.7 s
  6. tecsup.edu.pe at 6.9 s6.9 s
  7. tecsup.edu.pe at 8.0 s8.0 s
  8. tecsup.edu.pe at 9.1 s9.1 s

Speed

8 to fix57
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.9 s · 12.6 MB

    41 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.6 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    1.4 s · 8.0 MB

    17 images could be 8.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 214 KiB

    About 214 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57 (desktop: 67). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    550 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 280 ms

    280 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 280 ms of main-thread work and 322 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,716 HTML elements

    The page has 1,716 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, PageSense and zohocdn.com and others), adding 458 KiB and 306 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 234 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    About 22 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 683 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Your largest element takes 11.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 13.2 s

    13.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.4 s

    20.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 206 ms

    206 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 206 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 128 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 180 ms

    180 ms

    Real visitors wait 180 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix26
  • Page weight: 13.1 MB in 60 requests

    13.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 13.1 MB in 60 requests on a phone: images 12.3 MB (25), scripts 670 KiB (17) and fonts 96 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 3.8 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    600 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example OFERTA-ACADÉMICA.jpg at 1,500 px wide, shown at 371 px. Resized copies would save about 600 KiB.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (4.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    3B-1.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (238 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 3.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.72 g of CO₂e: 446.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7687
  • Unlabelled dropdowns

    1 dropdown has no label.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)

    Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h6 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7765
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “Tecsup”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 14 links crawlers can't follow

    14 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 58 internal links, 40 external

    The homepage links to 58 pages on tecsup.edu.pe and 40 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/wp-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,881 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix65
  • 3 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/escuela-de-operadores, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/noticias and https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/eventos, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 12 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/segmento-joven, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/segmento-adulto, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/buscador-y-biblioteca, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/empresas, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/electricidad-y-electronica and https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/gestion-y-produccion and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/segmento-joven, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/segmento-adulto, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/buscador-y-biblioteca, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/empresas, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/electricidad-y-electronica and https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/gestion-y-produccion and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 5 pages slow to respond

    https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/mecanica-y-aviacion, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/mecatronica, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/seguridad-y-salud-en-el-trabajo, https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/tecnologia-agricola and https://www.tecsup.edu.pe/areas-formativas/tecnologia-digital took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Maximum call stack size exceeded”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    54 of 60 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 967 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 967 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 17 cookies set on arrival

    17

    Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecsup.edu.pe, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Radware

Company

Founded
1982

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 46 issues on tecsup.edu.pe, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25