Website review, no card needed

teegschwendner.de logo

teegschwendner.de website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202642 issues · 96 checks

This review found 42 issues worth fixing on teegschwendner.de, 13 of them high impact, across 96 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 27. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s1.1 sMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.4 s
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.1 s
Aug 22, 20263.1 s
Aug 29, 20263.2 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.1 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.1 s
Oct 10, 20263.1 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
143 ms109 msMay 2Oct 17130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026113 ms
May 9, 2026114 ms
May 16, 2026115 ms
May 23, 2026117 ms
May 30, 2026119 ms
Jun 6, 2026122 ms
Jun 13, 2026124 ms
Jun 20, 2026127 ms
Jun 27, 2026128 ms
Jul 4, 2026128 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026128 ms
Jul 25, 2026129 ms
Aug 1, 2026130 ms
Aug 8, 2026136 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026139 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026135 ms
Sep 19, 2026134 ms
Sep 26, 2026132 ms
Oct 3, 2026131 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms
Oct 17, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of teegschwendner.de (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. teegschwendner.de at 1.2 s1.2 s
  2. teegschwendner.de at 2.4 s2.4 s
  3. teegschwendner.de at 3.6 s3.6 s
  4. teegschwendner.de at 4.9 s4.9 s
  5. teegschwendner.de at 6.1 s6.1 s
  6. teegschwendner.de at 7.3 s7.3 s
  7. teegschwendner.de at 8.5 s8.5 s
  8. teegschwendner.de at 9.7 s9.7 s

teegschwendner.de does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix27
  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27 (desktop: 51). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,468 HTML elements

    The page has 4,468 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager and PayPal and others), adding 1.1 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Usercentrics CMP adds 893 ms

    893 ms

    Usercentrics CMP costs a phone 893 ms of main-thread work and 260 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 565 KiB

    About 565 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 198 KiB

    About 198 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    250 ms · 495 KiB

    11 images could be 495 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    250 ms · 423 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (423 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 295 ms

    295 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 295 ms of main-thread work and 338 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 316 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    40 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify CSS

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 366 ms

    366 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 366 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Your largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Gemütliche Teestunden Herbsttees entdecken Teegeschenk find…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 20.2 s

    20.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 20.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 744 ms

    744 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 744 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.274

    0.274

    The layout shifts by 0.274 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors wait 2.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 127% slower for real visitors

    +127%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 13 images without width and height

    13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 15% slower for real visitors

    +15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 117 ms

    117 ms

    Real visitors wait 117 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.06

    0.06

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.06 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

Images and page weight

4 to fix58
  • Page weight: 3.2 MB in 170 requests

    3.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.2 MB in 170 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (100), images 883 KiB (20) and fonts 538 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (580 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 8 images below the first screen load straight away

    8 images further down the page (486 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    57 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example im-bag.jpg at 500 px wide, shown at 154 px. Resized copies would save about 57 KiB.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.92 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.92 g of CO₂e: 110.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9395
  • 21 text elements with low contrast

    21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 11 tap targets too small

    11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 51 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 51 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“Gemütliche Teestunden”, “Teeleidenschaft” and “Schnell zum Lieblingstee”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 142 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 142 pages on teegschwendner.de and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 139 characters

    Your meta description is 139 characters: “Große Auswahl an erlesenen losen Spitzentees der höchsten Qualitätsstufe. Exklusiv erhältlich bei unseren Fachgeschäfte…”.

  • Title: 39 characters

    Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Premium Tees auf höchstem Niveau kaufen”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.teegschwendner.de/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.teegschwendner.de/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,177 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix78
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    /wishlist/index is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    /wishlist/index, /Matcha and /UEber-uns have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /StoreLocator, whose canonical is /Filialfinder. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    /StoreLocator, /Tee, /Matcha, /Gutscheine, /Fachgeschaefte and /Tee/Matcha-Tee have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page slow to respond

    /Tee/Matcha-Tee took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 108 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://d21m4dsqdd3b9h.cloudfront.net/tgs835e/search/templates/main/deployment/1786535099/…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    16 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix88
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://teegschwendner.de does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (teegschwendner.de).

  • Valid certificate (99 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · Thawte TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for teegschwendner.de and is valid for another 99 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 44 links work

    All 44 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 4 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    teegschwendner.de has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

1 to fix83
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,554 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,554 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Reserve & Collect”.

  • 42 short forms

    42 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 172 testimonial or review blocks, 4 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx ip4:80.82.213.24 ip4:80.82.213.175 ip4:91.215.72.141 ip4:91.215.72.142 ip4:91.215.74.101 ip4:91.215.74.102 ip…”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “mail”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 17 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Usercentrics

    A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1978
Headquarters
Meckenheim

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 42 issues on teegschwendner.de, including 24 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25