Website review, no card needed

pitec.ch logo

pitec.ch website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202641 issues · 99 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on pitec.ch, 14 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
921 ms633 msMay 2Oct 17763 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 2026756 ms
May 9, 2026760 ms
May 16, 2026733 ms
May 23, 2026703 ms
May 30, 2026703 ms
Jun 6, 2026666 ms
Jun 13, 2026683 ms
Jun 20, 2026717 ms
Jun 27, 2026756 ms
Jul 4, 2026860 ms
Jul 11, 2026871 ms
Jul 18, 2026874 ms
Jul 25, 2026865 ms
Aug 1, 2026888 ms
Aug 8, 2026865 ms
Aug 15, 2026808 ms
Aug 22, 2026788 ms
Aug 29, 2026742 ms
Sep 5, 2026765 ms
Sep 12, 2026794 ms
Sep 19, 2026801 ms
Sep 26, 2026835 ms
Oct 3, 2026798 ms
Oct 10, 2026770 ms
Oct 17, 2026763 ms
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
96 ms69 msMay 2Oct 1789 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202679 ms
May 9, 202678 ms
May 16, 202672 ms
May 23, 202673 ms
May 30, 202673 ms
Jun 6, 202673 ms
Jun 13, 202673 ms
Jun 20, 202675 ms
Jun 27, 202678 ms
Jul 4, 202683 ms
Jul 11, 202684 ms
Jul 18, 202685 ms
Jul 25, 202686 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202693 ms
Aug 22, 202693 ms
Aug 29, 202689 ms
Sep 5, 202687 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202685 ms
Sep 26, 202686 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202687 ms
Oct 17, 202689 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of pitec.ch (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. pitec.ch at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. pitec.ch at 1.5 s1.5 s
  3. pitec.ch at 2.2 s2.2 s
  4. pitec.ch at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. pitec.ch at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. pitec.ch at 4.4 s4.4 s
  7. pitec.ch at 5.1 s5.1 s
  8. pitec.ch at 5.8 s5.8 s

pitec.ch does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

9 to fix59
  • Improve image delivery

    3.1 s · 3.4 MB

    11 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 s · 311 KiB

    About 311 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 495 KiB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (495 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 59

    59/100

    Your mobile performance score is 59 (desktop: 77). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Font display

    950 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 950 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 100 KiB

    About 100 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    400 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 400 ms.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 731 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Vimeo adds 32 ms

    32 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 32 ms of main-thread work and 375 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 186 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Vimeo), adding 375 KiB and 32 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    44 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 44 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 368 ms

    368 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 368 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.7 s

    11.7 s

    Your largest element takes 11.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “AKTION DER WOCHE SUPPENTOPF ELEKTRISCH JETZT PROFITIEREN”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.2 s

    19.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 265 ms

    265 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 265 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors

    +12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 89 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 0.8 s to 0.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 107 ms

    107 ms

    Real visitors wait 107 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 609 ms

    609 ms

    Real visitors wait 609 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.023

    0.023

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.023, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix45
  • Page weight: 5.2 MB in 74 requests

    5.2 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.2 MB in 74 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (15), scripts 611 KiB (48) and fonts 277 KiB (5). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images over 500 KB

    3 images weigh 2.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (2.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    Suedback_09-26.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (45 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.47 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.47 g of CO₂e: 175.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8090
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (6 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • 3 images without alt text

    3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8370
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (4 characters)

    Your title is only 4 characters: “Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 6 H1 headlines

    There are 6 <h1> headlines (“Aktion der Woche”, “Pitec Aktuell” and “Kreativität trifft Präszision”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at pitec.ch/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 126 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 126 pages on pitec.ch and 7 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://pitec.ch/.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://pitec.ch/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (788 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    /E-Shop, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Portionieren-l-Abfuellen, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Schaber-l-Spatel-l-Spachtel, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Ausstecher and /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Messer and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 14 pages without an H1

    /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Portionieren-l-Abfuellen, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Schaber-l-Spatel-l-Spachtel, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Ausstecher, /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Messer and /E-Shop/Schneiden-l-Teilen-l-Portionieren/Schneidbretter and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 94 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 23 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

2 to fix88
  • http:// does not redirect

    http://pitec.ch does not redirect to https, so some visitors land on the insecure version.

  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (pitec.ch).

  • Valid certificate (70 days left)

    The certificate from Let's Encrypt · YE2 verifies for pitec.ch and is valid for another 70 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 43 links work

    All 43 links checked from your homepage (40 internal, 3 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    pitec.ch has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,173 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,173 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “E-Shop” and “Zum E-Shop”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

1 to fix75
  • DMARC is monitor-only (p=none)

    DMARC is set to p=none, so mail pretending to be pitec.ch is still delivered. Add a report address, check the reports, then move to quarantine.

  • Email authentication score: 75/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 mx a:mailsecurity.allsystems.ch a:spf.trendhosting-net.ch include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “k2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This free review found 41 issues on pitec.ch, including 15 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25