Website review, no card needed
terravision.eu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202643 issues · 93 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on terravision.eu, 18 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
74CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 233 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 231 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 231 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 233 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 297 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 352 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 364 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 370 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 368 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 368 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 373 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 378 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 379 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.7 s
2.5 s
3.3 s
4.2 s
5.0 s
5.8 s
6.7 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.6 s26 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.6 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 848 KiB79 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (848 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,282 HTML elements
The page has 3,282 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and Facebook and others), adding 3.5 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 154 KiBAbout 154 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
cloudfront.net adds 374 ms
374 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 374 ms of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 261 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
155 KiB7 images could be 155 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
24 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 24 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
20 KiB20 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 58 but mobile only 32. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 115 ms
115 msYour server sent the HTML in 115 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 29.1 s
29.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.2 s
7.2 sYour largest element takes 7.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Low-cost high-quality transfers”.
First Contentful Paint: 5.1 s
5.1 sThe first text or image appears after 5.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.8 s
9.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 303 ms
303 msReal visitors wait 303 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 63% slower for real visitors
+63%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 233 ms to 379 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 42% slower for real visitors
+42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 968 ms
968 msReal visitors wait 968 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.1 MB in 175 requests
4.1 MBYour homepage downloads 4.1 MB in 175 requests on a phone: scripts 2.7 MB (59), images 746 KiB (53) and stylesheets 224 KiB (34). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images in older formats
3 images (155 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (78 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.17 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.17 g of CO₂e: 140.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Unlabelled dropdowns
3 dropdowns have no label.
Invalid ARIA attributes
2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (22 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 form fields without a label
8 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
46 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 46 pages on terravision.eu and 24 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 108 characters
Your meta description is 108 characters: “Low-Cost Transfers 💰 to/from Major Airports ✈️ and City Centers. Services: frequent, efficient, high value!”.
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Airport Transfers accross Europe: Lowcost, High Value!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.terravision.eu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, TravelAgency, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.terravision.eu/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Opted out of AI training for 1 crawler
robots.txt blocks CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (459 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.terravision.eu/llms.txt (5 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://www.terravision.eu/terravision-loyalty-program.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
8 pages without an H1
https://www.terravision.eu/italiano, https://www.terravision.eu/tedesco, https://www.terravision.eu/francese, https://www.terravision.eu/spagnolo, https://www.terravision.eu/pl and https://www.terravision.eu/airport_services.html and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to find a valid digest in the 'integrity' attribute for resource 'https://www.dwin1.com/9822.js' with computed S…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 26 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
A 11-field form
Your longest form asks for 11 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 485 words of copy
The homepage carries about 485 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book now”.
5 calls to action
The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Book now” and “SUBSCRIBE”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Hotjar.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
29 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 29 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at terravision.eu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Company
- Founded
- 2002
- Headquarters
- Rome
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on terravision.eu, including 23 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.