Website review, no card needed

tumblr.com logo

tumblr.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202645 issues · 79 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on tumblr.com, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s2.3 sApr 18Oct 32.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.4 s
Apr 25, 20262.4 s
May 2, 20262.4 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.4 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
309 ms277 msApr 18Oct 3287 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026295 ms
Apr 25, 2026294 ms
May 2, 2026290 ms
May 9, 2026285 ms
May 16, 2026281 ms
May 23, 2026281 ms
May 30, 2026286 ms
Jun 6, 2026293 ms
Jun 13, 2026296 ms
Jun 20, 2026298 ms
Jun 27, 2026300 ms
Jul 4, 2026299 ms
Jul 11, 2026302 ms
Jul 18, 2026304 ms
Jul 25, 2026304 ms
Aug 1, 2026305 ms
Aug 8, 2026304 ms
Aug 15, 2026302 ms
Aug 22, 2026298 ms
Aug 29, 2026295 ms
Sep 5, 2026293 ms
Sep 12, 2026291 ms
Sep 19, 2026291 ms
Sep 26, 2026289 ms
Oct 3, 2026287 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tumblr.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tumblr.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tumblr.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tumblr.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. tumblr.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. tumblr.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. tumblr.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. tumblr.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. tumblr.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix42
  • Improve image delivery

    50.6 s · 10.6 MB

    15 images could be 10.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 266 KiB

    About 266 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 45). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 5,194 HTML elements

    The page has 5,194 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 108 KiB

    About 108 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 471 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • YouTube adds 11 ms

    11 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 11 ms of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 7 third-party services on the page

    7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, WordPress and Scorecard Research and others), adding 355 KiB and 27 ms of main-thread time.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3 KiB).

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.37

    0.37

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 63.2 s

    63.2 s

    Your largest element takes 63.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 63.2 s

    63.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 63.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 343 ms

    343 ms

    Real visitors wait 343 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 583 ms

    583 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 583 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 295 ms to 287 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 12.9 MB in 117 requests

    12.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 12.9 MB in 117 requests on a phone: images 11.0 MB (40), scripts 1.1 MB (51) and fonts 273 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.65 g of CO₂e: 438.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8273
  • Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)

    Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 22 text elements with low contrast

    22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.

    ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 7 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 10 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 7 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 9276
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (6 characters)

    Your title is only 6 characters: “Tumblr”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 12 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 12 pages on tumblr.com and 1 external page.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 126 characters

    Your meta description is 126 characters: “Tumblr is the place you go to be yourself on the internet. No performance, no perfection. Just you, and the people who …”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tumblr.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tumblr.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

5 to fix76
  • 5 pages share a title

    /, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending, https://www.tumblr.com/policy/terms-of-service, https://www.tumblr.com/policy/privacy and https://www.tumblr.com/privacy/en all use the title “Tumblr”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.tumblr.com/help has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 pages share a meta description

    https://www.tumblr.com/policy/terms-of-service, https://www.tumblr.com/policy/privacy and https://www.tumblr.com/privacy/en use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.tumblr.com/about, whose canonical is https://www.tumblr.com/@about. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending, https://www.tumblr.com/communities/browse, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/staff-picks, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/video and https://www.tumblr.com/about have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 6 pages with very little text

    https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending, https://www.tumblr.com/communities/browse, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/staff-picks, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/video, https://www.tumblr.com/apps and https://www.tumblr.com/policy/privacy have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 10 internal pages checked

    We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8189
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'ready')”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 27 words

    The homepage has only about 27 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Sign up”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tumblr.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on tumblr.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25