Website review, no card needed
tumblr.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202645 issues · 79 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on tumblr.com, 16 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 294 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 290 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 285 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 281 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 281 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 300 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 302 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 293 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 291 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 287 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
50.6 s · 10.6 MB15 images could be 10.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50.6 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 266 KiBAbout 266 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 45). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,194 HTML elements
The page has 5,194 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 108 KiBAbout 108 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 471 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.4 s
A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
YouTube adds 11 ms
11 msYouTube costs a phone 11 ms of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 10 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, WordPress and Scorecard Research and others), adding 355 KiB and 27 ms of main-thread time.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3 KiB).
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.37
0.37For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sThe first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 63.2 s
63.2 sYour largest element takes 63.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 63.2 s
63.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 63.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.3 s
9.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 343 ms
343 msReal visitors wait 343 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 583 ms
583 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 583 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 295 ms to 287 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.9 MB in 117 requests
12.9 MBYour homepage downloads 12.9 MB in 117 requests on a phone: images 11.0 MB (40), scripts 1.1 MB (51) and fonts 273 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 3.6 g of CO₂ per visit
3.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.65 g of CO₂e: 438.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation (1 element)
Documents must have <title> element to aid in navigation: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
22 text elements with low contrast
22 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names. (1 element).
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (9 elements).
1 checks passed
7 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 10 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 7 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (6 characters)
Your title is only 6 characters: “Tumblr”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
12 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 12 pages on tumblr.com and 1 external page.
4 checks passed
Meta description: 126 characters
Your meta description is 126 characters: “Tumblr is the place you go to be yourself on the internet. No performance, no perfection. Just you, and the people who …”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tumblr.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tumblr.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 4 crawlers
robots.txt blocks ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
5 pages share a title
/, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending, https://www.tumblr.com/policy/terms-of-service, https://www.tumblr.com/policy/privacy and https://www.tumblr.com/privacy/en all use the title “Tumblr”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.tumblr.com/help has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://www.tumblr.com/policy/terms-of-service, https://www.tumblr.com/policy/privacy and https://www.tumblr.com/privacy/en use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.tumblr.com/about, whose canonical is https://www.tumblr.com/@about. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
5 pages without an H1
https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending, https://www.tumblr.com/communities/browse, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/staff-picks, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/video and https://www.tumblr.com/about have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://www.tumblr.com/explore/trending, https://www.tumblr.com/communities/browse, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/staff-picks, https://www.tumblr.com/explore/video, https://www.tumblr.com/apps and https://www.tumblr.com/policy/privacy have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
10 internal pages checked
We fetched 10 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 10 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'ready')”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 27 words
The homepage has only about 27 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Sign up”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Comscore (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tumblr.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on tumblr.com, including 20 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.