Website review, no card needed

untis.at logo

untis.at website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202625 issues · 70 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on untis.at, 5 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.8 sApr 25Oct 101.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.9 s
May 2, 20261.9 s
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20261.9 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20261.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20262.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
95 ms86 msApr 25Oct 1094 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202693 ms
May 2, 202694 ms
May 9, 202693 ms
May 16, 202692 ms
May 23, 202693 ms
May 30, 202690 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202693 ms
Jun 20, 202693 ms
Jun 27, 202694 ms
Jul 4, 202694 ms
Jul 11, 202692 ms
Jul 18, 202691 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202687 ms
Aug 8, 202688 ms
Aug 15, 202690 ms
Aug 22, 202690 ms
Aug 29, 202693 ms
Sep 5, 202693 ms
Sep 12, 202693 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202694 ms
Oct 3, 202694 ms
Oct 10, 202694 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of untis.at (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. untis.at at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. untis.at at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. untis.at at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. untis.at at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. untis.at at 2.2 s2.2 s
  6. untis.at at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. untis.at at 3.1 s3.1 s
  8. untis.at at 3.5 s3.5 s

Speed

4 to fix72
  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72 (desktop: 90). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 70 KiB

    1 image could be 70 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 67 KiB

    About 67 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 34 KiB

    About 34 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 250 ms.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 61 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 90 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 123 ms

    123 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 123 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    Your largest element takes 4.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “sp_mockup.jpg”. Most of its time is resource load delay (3.0 s).

  • Real-user TTFB: 833 ms

    833 ms

    Real visitors wait 833 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.176

    0.176

    The layout shifts by 0.176 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.4 s

    4.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 93 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Real visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 82 ms

    82 ms

    Real visitors wait 82 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 11 ms

    11 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 11 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (87 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.21 g of CO₂e: 24.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 742 KiB in 20 requests

    742 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 742 KiB in 20 requests on a phone: fonts 303 KiB (6), images 242 KiB (5) and scripts 135 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9698
  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 7768
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (12 characters)

    Your title is only 12 characters: “Untis - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 77 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 77 pages on untis.at and 12 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.untis.at/en/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebPage.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.untis.at/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.untis.at/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,212 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix70
  • 2 linked pages hidden from search

    https://www.untis.at/en/why-untis/about-the-company/about-untis-1-1 and https://www.untis.at/en/products are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 4 pages share a title

    https://www.untis.at/en, /, https://www.untis.at/de and https://www.untis.at/es all use the title “Untis - Home”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://www.untis.at/en/why-untis/about-the-company/about-untis-1-1, /, https://www.untis.at/de, https://www.untis.at/es, https://www.untis.at/fi/partner/finland and https://www.untis.at/en/products and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 3 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example /, whose canonical is https://www.untis.at/en. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.untis.at/en/why-untis/about-the-company/about-untis-1-1, /, https://www.untis.at/de, https://www.untis.at/es, https://www.untis.at/fi/partner/finland and https://www.untis.at/en/products and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

2 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    9 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 826 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 826 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “TRY FOR FREE”.

  • 14 calls to action

    The homepage has 14 calls to action, for example “Class register”, “Untis Demo-Slideshow” and “WebUntis Demo Slideshow”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at untis.at, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
TYPO3 CMS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on untis.at, including 11 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25